Cox v. Feather

Filing 8

ORDER GRANTING 7 MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(TF) cc: D Cox

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 DOUGLAS MICHAEL COX, 9 10 11 12 Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. C13-2075RSL ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT Respondent. 13 14 This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner’s “Motion for Leave to File 15 Supplemental Pleading (Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(d)).” Dkt. # 7. Petitioner seeks leave of 16 court to supplement his petition to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 17 U.S.C. § 2255. Id. Having considered Petitioner’s motion and the remainder of the 18 record, the Court finds as follows: 19 Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 15”), which governs 20 amendments to pleadings in civil cases, applies to habeas proceedings. Mayle v. Felix, 21 545 U.S. 644, 654-55 (2005); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 81(a)(4)(A). Pursuant to Rule 15, 22 23 24 a party may amend his pleading once as a matter of course (without leave of court) within 21 days of serving it. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). Because Petitioner filed his request to supplement within the time provided by Rule 15 and the government has not yet responded, the Court GRANTS Petitioner’s motion (Dkt. # 7). 25 26 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT - 1 1 DATED this 10th day of December, 2013. 2 3 A 4 Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?