Cox v. Feather
Filing
8
ORDER GRANTING 7 MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(TF) cc: D Cox
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
DOUGLAS MICHAEL COX,
9
10
11
12
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Case No. C13-2075RSL
ORDER GRANTING MOTION
TO SUPPLEMENT
Respondent.
13
14
This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner’s “Motion for Leave to File
15
Supplemental Pleading (Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(d)).” Dkt. # 7. Petitioner seeks leave of
16
court to supplement his petition to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28
17
U.S.C. § 2255. Id. Having considered Petitioner’s motion and the remainder of the
18
record, the Court finds as follows:
19
Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 15”), which governs
20
amendments to pleadings in civil cases, applies to habeas proceedings. Mayle v. Felix,
21
545 U.S. 644, 654-55 (2005); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 81(a)(4)(A). Pursuant to Rule 15,
22
23
24
a party may amend his pleading once as a matter of course (without leave of court)
within 21 days of serving it. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). Because Petitioner filed his request
to supplement within the time provided by Rule 15 and the government has not yet
responded, the Court GRANTS Petitioner’s motion (Dkt. # 7).
25
26
ORDER GRANTING MOTION
TO SUPPLEMENT - 1
1
DATED this 10th day of December, 2013.
2
3
A
4
Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER GRANTING MOTION
TO SUPPLEMENT - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?