Chef'n Corporation v. Progressive International Corporation
Filing
32
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 30 Motion for Leave to File Corrected Opposition to Defendant's 24 Motion to Amend Answer and Counterclaims by Judge Richard A Jones.(LMK)
1
HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
9
10
CHEF’N CORPORATION,
11
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
PROGRESSIVE INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION,
15
16
Defendant.
17
CASE NO. 2:14-cv-00068-RAJ
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
CHEF’N CORPORATION’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
CORRECTED OPPOSITION TO
PROGRESSIVE
INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION’S MOTION TO
AMEND ANSWER AND
COUNTERCLAIMS
18
19
20
21
22
23
Pending before the Court is Chef’n Corporation’s (“Chef’n”) motion for leave to file
corrected opposition to Progressive International Corporation’s (“Progressive”) motion to amend
answer and counterclaims. Dkt. # 30. Having considered the motion and for good cause
appearing, it is hereby ordered that Chef’n’s motion for leave to file is GRANTED. The
corrected opposition (Dkt. # 30-2) is deemed filed and will supersede the previous motion. 1
24
25
1
The court will consider the arguments made by Progressive in its response to the corrected
opposition (Dkt. # 31) as part of Progressive’s reply to its motion to amend answer and
27 counterclaims.
26
[PROPOSED] ORDER - 1
CASE NO. 2:14-CV-00068-RAJ
1
Dated this 6th day of November, 2014.
2
A
3
4
The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
[PROPOSED] ORDER - 2
CASE NO. 2:14-CV-00068-RAJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?