Block v. Snohomish County et al

Filing 46

ORDER Terminating Plaintiff's 44 Motion to Strike by Judge Richard A Jones. Case stayed pending further order of the court subject to exceptions. (LMK)

Download PDF
HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 ANNE BLOCK, Plaintiff, 10 11 12 CASE NO. C14-235RAJ ORDER v. SNOHOMISH COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 13 14 The court directs the clerk to TERMINATE Plaintiff’s motion to strike. Dkt. # 44. 15 The motion violates this court’s local rules in numerous ways. At a minimum, it violates 16 a prohibition on separate motions to strike, it is too long, and it contains no noting date. 17 See Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 7(b)(1), 7(d)(3), 7(e)(3). 18 The record before the court reflects that this litigation threatens to spiral out of 19 control. It also reflects that Plaintiff’s communication with opposing counsel and 20 opposing parties in this case falls well below the standards of civility that this court 21 expects from litigants. To preserve order while the court resolves both the pending 22 motions to dismiss and Defendants’ motion for sanctions, the court orders as follows: 23 24 1) This litigation is STAYED pending further order of the court subject only to the following exceptions: a) The parties shall complete briefing, in accordance with the local rules, 25 on Defendants’ motion for sanctions. Dkt. # 40. 26 27 28 ORDER – 1 b) Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants may exchange good-faith written 1 settlement offers. 2 3 2) No party may propound or pursue discovery while the stay is in effect. 4 3) While this stay is in effect, no party may file any motion, unless the motion 5 6 seeks emergency relief or is stipulated. 4) While this stay is in effect, there will be no communication between Plaintiff 7 and any Defendant about this lawsuit. Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants 8 may communicate only for the purpose of making or responding to a 9 settlement offer or for making or responding to a good faith request for a 10 11 stipulation or stipulated motion. If any party violates this order, the court will impose monetary sanctions and may 12 impose evidentiary sanctions or dismiss this action. 13 DATED this 29th day of July, 2014. 14 A 15 16 The Honorable Richard A. Jones United States District Court Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER – 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?