Draganov v. Washington State Bar Association
Filing
6
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Plaintiffs IFP application is DENIED based on his monthly salary and the amount of funds in his checking account. Plaintiff is directed to pay the full filing fee of $400 within thirty days of the date of this Order. If the filing fee is not paid, this case will be dismissed re 5 Report and Recommendations, by Judge John C Coughenour. (MD, mailed copy of order to pltf)
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
DETELIN DRAGANOV,
10
Plaintiff,
11
CASE NO. C14-0312-JCC
ORDER
v.
12
13
WASHINGTON STATE BAR
ASSOCIATION,
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Defendant.
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable
Mary Alice Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge. (Dkt. No. 5.) No objections have been filed.
Having thoroughly considered the proposed complaint, the Report and Recommendation, and the
balance of the record, the Court hereby ORDERS:
(1) The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in full;
(2) Plaintiff’s IFP application is DENIED based on his monthly salary and the amount of
21
funds in his checking account. Plaintiff is directed to pay the full filing fee of $400
22
within thirty days of the date of this Order. If the filing fee is not paid, this case will
23
24
be dismissed.
(3) The Clerk shall file the complaint only on receipt of the filing fee. If no filing fee is
25
26
paid within thirty days of the date of this Order, the Clerk is directed to close the file;
(4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and to the Honorable
ORDER
PAGE - 1
1
2
Mary Alice Theiler.
DATED this 9th day of April 2014.
3
4
5
A
6
7
8
John C. Coughenour
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?