Starbucks Corporation v. NeoMedia Technologies Inc

Filing 19

ORDER granting 18 Plaintiff Starbucks Corporation's stipulated motion to stay proceedings. The parties to submit a status update every six months while case is stayed, or within 10 days of resolution of the related litigation in the other jurisdiction, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(RM)

Download PDF
Honorable Marsha J. Pechman 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 STARBUCKS CORPORATION a Washington corporation, Plaintiff, 9 10 11 v. NEOMEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. a Delaware corporation, Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-00365-MJP ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF STARBUCKS CORPORATION’S STIPULATED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: MAY 16, 2014 Defendant. 12 13 Before this Court is Plaintiff Starbucks Corporation’s Stipulated Motion to Stay Proceedings. 14 Starbucks respectfully requests that the Court stay the proceedings in this matter pending a motion to 15 lift the stay made by either party in this action. (Dkt. No. 18.) 16 The Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s request and stays the proceedings in this matter pending the 17 outcome of related litigation in other jurisdictions. Either party may move to lift the stay at any time. 18 The Parties are ORDERED to submit a status update every six (6) months following the entry of this 19 Order while the case is stayed, or within 10 days of resolution of the related litigation in the other 20 jurisdiction. 21 The Clerk is ordered to provide copies of this Order to all counsel. 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S STIPULATED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDING - 1 1 2 3 4 5 DATED this 22nd day of May, 2014. A Marsha J. Pechman Chief United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S STIPULATED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDING - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?