Broadus v. City of Bellevue et al
Filing
33
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; City of Bellevue's motion for jgm on the pleadings is granted with respect to plaintiffs § 1983 claims and plaintiffs federal constitutional claims are dismissed with prejudice. This Citys motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 27) is DENIED as moot with respect to plaintiffs state law claims and plaintiffs state law claims are dismissed without prejudice; by Judge Richard A Jones. (RS)cc pltf
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
MARVIN TATE BROADUS,
Plaintiff,
9
10
11
Case No. C14-490-RAJ
v.
CITY OF BELLEVUE, et al.,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
Defendants.
12
13
14
The Court, having reviewed plaintiff’s complaint, the City of Bellevue’s motion for
15
judgment on the pleadings and for summary judgment, the Report and Recommendation of the
16
Honorable Mary Alice Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge, any objections thereto, and the
17
remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:
18
(1)
The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;
19
(2)
The City of Bellevue’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. 27) is
20
GRANTED with respect to plaintiff’s § 1983 claims and plaintiff’s federal constitutional claims
21
are dismissed with prejudice. This City’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 27) is DENIED
22
as moot with respect to plaintiff’s state law claims and plaintiff’s state law claims are dismissed
23
without prejudice; and
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS - 1
1
(3)
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, to counsel for
2
defendants, and to the Honorable Mary Alice Theiler.
3
DATED this 3rd day of February, 2015.
4
A
5
6
The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?