Blake v. Sinclair

Filing 18

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION - the court GRANTS Mr. Blakes motion (Dkt. # 16) and DISMISSES his habeas corpus petition (Dkt. # 3) without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). Further, the court STRIKES Magistrate Judge Theilers Report and Recommendations (Dkt. # 13) as moot, by Judge James L. Robart.(MD, cc to petitioner)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 JEROME BLAKE, CASE NO. C14-0633JLR Petitioner, 11 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION v. 12 DONALD HOLBROOK, 13 Respondent. 14 15 Petitioner Jerome Blake moves to voluntarily dismiss his habeas corpus petition 16 without prejudice. (See Dkt. # 16 (“So if the courts would be merciful in dismissing my 17 brief (habeas corpus) without prejudice so that I could re-visit these issue[s] at a later 18 time.”)) Respondent Donald Holbrook does not object to Mr. Blake’s motion. (Dkt. 19 # 17.) In light of the parties’ agreement, the court GRANTS Mr. Blake’s motion (Dkt. 20 # 16) and DISMISSES his habeas corpus petition (Dkt. # 3) without prejudice pursuant to 21 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). 22 // ORDER- 1 1 Further, the court STRIKES Magistrate Judge Theiler’s Report and Recommendations 2 (Dkt. # 13) as moot. 3 Dated this 3rd day of November, 2014. 4 6 A 7 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 5 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER- 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?