Northwest Administrators Inc v. Pacific Delivery Service, Inc

Filing 9

ORDER granting pltf's 7 Motion for Default Judgment by Judge Richard A Jones.(RS)

Download PDF
HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 NORTHWEST ADMINISTRATORS, INC., 10 11 12 Plaintiff, PACIFIC DELIVERY SERVICE, INC., 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER Defendant. This matter comes before the court on Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. Dkt. # 7. The court GRANTS the motion, and directs the clerk to enter a default judgment in accordance with this order. The court’s role in considering a motion for default judgment is not ministerial. The court must accept all well-pleaded allegations of the complaint as established fact, except facts related to the amount of damages. TeleVideo Sys., Inc. v. Heidenthal, 826 F.2d 915, 917-18 (9th Cir. 1987). Where those facts establish a defendant’s liability, the court has discretion, not an obligation, to enter a default judgment. Aldabe v. Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089, 1092 (9th Cir. 1980); Alan Neuman Productions, Inc. v. Albright, 862 F.2d 1388, 1392 (9th Cir. 1988). The plaintiff must provide evidence to support a claim for a particular sum of damages. TeleVideo Sys., 826 F.2d at 917-18; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2)(B). Where the plaintiff cannot prove that the sum he seeks is “a liquidated sum or capable of mathematical calculation,” the court must conduct a hearing or otherwise 27 28 CASE NO. C14-635RAJ v. ORDER – 1 1 ensure that the damage award is appropriate. Davis v. Fendler, 650 F.2d 1154, 1161 (9th 2 Cir. 1981). 3 Plaintiff has established that Defendant withdrew from a pension fund that it 4 administers and that Plaintiff assessed Defendant’s liability for withdrawal at 5 $239,452.54. Ditter Decl. (Dkt. # 8), ¶ 12 & Ex. D. Plaintiff has established that it 6 complied with the terms of the governing contract as to notifying Defendant of its 7 withdrawal liability, and that because Defendant did not make payments in accordance 8 with Plaintiff’s demand, Plaintiff has the right to declare the entire balance of withdrawal 9 liability due. Ditter Decl., Ex. A (Employer Withdrawal Liability Rules and Procedures 10 at § 16(c)(5). Plaintiff has also established that the unpaid withdrawal liability is a 11 delinquent “Employer Contribution” within the meaning of the trust agreement, and that 12 Plaintiff is therefore entitled to liquidated damages of 20% of the withdrawal liability, or 13 $47,890.51 in this case. Id. (Trust Agr. Part I, § 9 (defining “Employer Contributions”), 14 Part IV, § 3(b)(2) (providing liquidated damages for delinquent contributions). By virtue 15 of the same agreement, Plaintiff is entitled to $557.75 in interest accrued through June 16 15, 2014, and is entitled to interest on the withdrawal liability only at a rate of 3.25% per 17 year thereafter. 18 Plaintiff has established entitlement to attorney fees of $1,873.50 and costs of 19 $469. Although Plaintiff’s evidence of attorney fees includes the hourly fees of non- 20 attorneys, Plaintiff has established that its counsel does not incorporate non-attorney 21 work into its hourly rate, and has established that counsel actually bills Plaintiff for the 22 work of non-attorneys. In accordance with Trustees of the Const. Indus. & Laborers 23 Health & Welfare Trust v. Redland Ins. Co., 460 F.3d 1253, 1256-57 (9th Cir. 2006), the 24 court awards the hourly fees of both Plaintiff’s counsel and counsel’s hourly-billing 25 support staff. 26 27 28 ORDER – 2 1 2 3 The court directs the clerk to enter default judgment for Plaintiff in accordance with this order. DATED this 14th day of July, 2014. 4 A 5 6 The Honorable Richard A. Jones United States District Court Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER – 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?