Boffoli v. Google Inc.
Filing
1
COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Google Inc. (Receipt # 0981-3592182) Attorney Keith P Scully added to party Christopher Boffoli(pty:pla), filed by Christopher Boffoli. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet, # 4 Report on Copyrights (AO Form121))(Scully, Keith)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
11
CHRISTOPHER BOFFOLI,
an individual,
14
15
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT
INFRINGEMENT
Plaintiff,
12
13
Case No. 14-655
v.
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation,
DOES 1-5,
16
Defendants
17
18
CHRISTOPHER BOFFOLI, (“Boffoli” or “Plaintiff”) hereby alleges for his
19
complaint against GOOGLE INC. (“Google”) upon personal information as to Plaintiff’s
20
own activities, and upon information and belief as to the activities of others, as follows:
21
22
23
I.
1.
26
27
28
This is a claim for copyright infringement arising under the copyright laws
of the United States, Title 17 of the United States Code.
24
25
NATURE OF THE CASE
II.
2.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
This Court has exclusive subject matter jurisdiction over this action
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).
3.
This Court has personal jurisdiction over Google because it conducts
substantial business in the State of Washington.
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT
INFRINGEMENT- 1
NEWMAN DU WORS LLP
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 1600
Seattle, Washington 98101
(206) 274-2800
1
2
4.
The claims alleged in this Complaint arise in the State of Washington and
the Western District of Washington and elsewhere.
3
5.
Venue is appropriate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(1-3).
4
III.
5
6
6.
Plaintiff is an individual and resident of the Western District of
Washington.
7
8
PARTIES
7.
Google is a Delaware corporation with its headquarters and principal
business address at 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View CA 94043.
9
8.
Plaintiff doesn’t know the true names of defendants named in this
10
complaint as Does 1 through 5 and therefore sues those defendants by such fictitious
11
names. Plaintiff will amend the complaint to include the true names of the Doe
12
Defendants and allege facts supporting their liability when Plaintiff learns them through
13
discovery. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that each of the
14
fictitiously named defendants is responsible in some manner for the acts and omissions
15
that give rise to Plaintiff’s injuries, and that the Doe Defendants proximately caused
16
Plaintiff’s injuries.
17
IV.
FACTS
18
19
20
A.
Boffoli created copyrightable photographs and registered them with the U.S.
Copyright Office.
9.
Boffoli is a fine art, editorial and commercial photographer who created
21
“Big Appetites”, a series of photographs featuring tiny figures photographed against real
22
food backdrops. Big Appetites has been published in more than 100 countries around the
23
world, with coverage in publications such as the New York Times, Washington Post,
24
NPR, and CBS This Morning, among many others. Fine art photographs from the
25
collection can be found in galleries and private collections in the US, Canada, Europe and
26
Asia. Boffoli is frequently hired by magazines for editorial commissions and by large
27
brands for commercial work based on the Big Appetites series. Boffoli’s images are also
28
licensed for publication for books, magazines, websites and greeting cards.
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT
INFRINGEMENT- 2
NEWMAN DU WORS LLP
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 1600
Seattle, Washington 98101
(206) 274-2800
1
10.
Boffoli’s business is based on licensing and selling photographs he creates.
2
Big Appetites photographs are currently available for purchase at fine art galleries, and
3
can also be purchased over the Internet, including through Boffoli’s website. Boffoli has
4
licensed use of Big Appetites photographs to greeting card companies, calendars, and
5
others.
6
11.
Boffoli registered each photograph in the Big Appetites series with the U.S.
7
Copyright Office and has Copyright Registration Nos. VAu001106484 (June 13, 2011)
8
and VAu001148370 (August 3, 2013).
9
10
B.
11
Google’s customer posts photographs from Big Appetites without license or
permission from Boffoli on webpages housed on Google’s servers.
12.
Google provides services to at least one Doe Defendant and allows that Doe
12
Defendant to house its website content on Google’s servers, including content that
13
infringes on Boffoli’s copyright (the “Infringing Content”). The Infringing Content is
14
hosted on Google’s servers at: and .
15
13.
The Infringing Content hosted by Google contains numerous photographs
16
from Big Appetites without license or permission from Boffoli. A copy of the infringing
17
content is provided as Exhibit A.
18
19
20
C.
Google failed to prevent the Infringing Website from being assessable over
the Internet despite notice from Boffoli.
14.
On information and belief, Google can remove the Infringing Content
21
hosted on Google’s servers. Google can also disable the Doe Defendant’s ability to post
22
content to the Internet.
23
15.
Google’s registration with the United States Copyright Office for receipt of
24
Digital Millenium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) identifies “dmca-agent@google.com” as the
25
email address of its designated agent. A copy of Google’s registration is provided as
26
Exhibit B.
27
16.
28
On December 20, 2013, Boffoli sent a notice to Google’s dmca-
agent@google.com email address notifying Google of the Infringing Content. Google
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT
INFRINGEMENT- 3
NEWMAN DU WORS LLP
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 1600
Seattle, Washington 98101
(206) 274-2800
1
responded by email that it received Boffoli’s notice and asked him to confirm that it was
2
complete. Boffoli did so that same day. Boffoli’s notice and subsequent correspondence
3
with Google are attached as Exhibit C.
4
17.
Boffoli never authorized his work to be posted on the Infringing Website.
5
18.
As late as April 9, 2014—more than 100 days after receiving Boffoli’s
6
notice—Google had not removed or disabled access to the Infringing Content. (See
7
Exhibit A.)
8
9
10
11
19.
On information and belief, on or about April 24, 2014 Google finally
removed or disabled access to the Infringing Content.
V.
CAUSE OF ACTION
COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND CONTRIBUTORY COPYRIGHT
INFRINGEMENT
12
20.
Boffoli hereby incorporates Paragraphs 1-19 by reference.
13
21.
Boffoli is, and at all relevant times has been, the owner of the copyright in
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
the photographs in the Big Appetites series.
22.
Each photograph in Big Appetites is copyrightable subject matter under 17
U.S.C. § 102(a)(5).
23.
Boffoli has complied in all respects with the provisions of the Copyright
Act and all regulations thereunder.
24.
Boffoli registered the copyright in each photograph in Big Appetites with
the United States Copyright Office.
25.
Boffoli has the exclusive rights under 17 U.S.C. § 106 to (1) reproduce the
22
photographs in Big Appetites, (2) prepare derivative works based on Big Appetites, (3)
23
distribute copies of Big Appetites, and (4) display Big Appetites publicly.
24
26.
Without the permission or consent of Boffoli, photographs from Big
25
Appetites were reproduced, derivative works were made from, copies were distributed of,
26
and the photographs were displayed on the Infringing Website, which is hosted on
27
Google’s servers.
28
27.
Boffoli’s exclusive rights in the photographs in Big Appetites were
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT
INFRINGEMENT- 4
NEWMAN DU WORS LLP
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 1600
Seattle, Washington 98101
(206) 274-2800
1
2
3
4
violated.
28.
Google induced, caused, or materially contributed to the Infringing
Website’s publication.
29.
Google had actual knowledge of the Infringing Website. Boffoli provided
5
notice to Google in compliance with the DMCA, and Google failed to expeditiously
6
disable access to or remove the Infringing Website.
7
30.
Google acted willfully.
8
31.
Alternatively, Google directly infringed Boffoli’s copyrights by continuing
9
to allow public access to the Infringing Website on Google’s servers.
10
11
VI.
RELIEF REQUESTED
WHEREFORE, Boffoli asks this Court to enter judgment against Google and
12
Google’s subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, employees, and all persons acting in concert or
13
participation with them, granting the following relief:
14
15
16
1.
Temporary and permanent injunctions preventing and restraining
infringement of Big Appetites by Google under 17 U.S.C. § 502;
2.
An order requiring the destruction of all copies made by or under the
17
control of Google of the photographs in Big Appetites and all articles by which such
18
copies may be reproduced under 17 U.S.C. § 503;
19
3.
An award of the actual damages suffered by Boffoli as the result of
20
Google’s infringement plus the profits of Google attributable to the infringement under
21
17 U.S.C. § 504(b);
22
23
24
25
26
27
4.
Alternatively, if Boffoli so elects, an award of statutory damages for each
infringement of Big Appetites under 17 U.S.C. § 504;
5.
A judgment that Google’s infringement was willful and an increased
statutory damage award under 17 U.S.C. § 504(c)(2);
6.
An award of Plaintiff’s full costs including a reasonable attorney’s fee
under 17 U.S.C. § 505; and
28
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT
INFRINGEMENT- 5
NEWMAN DU WORS LLP
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 1600
Seattle, Washington 98101
(206) 274-2800
1
7.
2
circumstances.
For such other and further relief as may be just and proper under the
3
4
Dated May 2, 2014.
5
6
Respectfully Submitted,
7
NEWMAN DU WORS LLP
8
9
By:
Keith Scully, WSBA No. 28677
10
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff
12
CHRISTOPHER BOFFOLI
13
14
15
JURY DEMAND
16
17
18
Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 38(b), Plaintiff Christopher Boffoli demands a trial by
jury of all issues presented in this complaint which are triable by jury.
19
20
Dated May 2, 2014
21
22
Respectfully Submitted,
NEWMAN DU WORS LLP
23
24
25
By:
26
Keith Scully, WSBA No. 28677
27
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CHRISTOPHER BOFFOLI
28
COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT
INFRINGEMENT- 6
NEWMAN DU WORS LLP
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 1600
Seattle, Washington 98101
(206) 274-2800
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?