Kinzle v. Glebe

Filing 69

ORDER granting Petitioner's 68 Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner is directed to file his response to respondent's answer no later than 4/15/2019. Respondent's answer (Dkt. 66 ) is RE-NOTED on the Court's calendar for consideration on 4/19/2019. Respondent shall file any reply brief in support of his answer by that date. Signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. (TH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 JEFFERY M. KINZLE, Petitioner, 9 10 11 Case No. C14-703-JCC-JPD v. ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MIKE OBENLAND, Respondent. 12 13 14 This is a federal habeas action brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This matter comes 15 before the Court at the present time on petitioner’s motion for an extension of time to file a 16 response to respondent’s answer to petitioner’s third amended federal habeas petition. Petitioner 17 represents to the Court that respondent does not oppose the requested extension. The Court, 18 having considered petitioner’s motion, and the balance of the record, hereby ORDERS as 19 follows: 20 21 (1) Petitioner’s unopposed motion for extension of time (Dkt. 68) is GRANTED. Petitioner is directed to file his response to respondent’s answer not later than April 15, 2019. 22 23 ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - 1 1 (2) Respondent’s answer (Dkt. 66) is RE-NOTED on the Court’s calendar for 2 consideration on April 19, 2019. Respondent shall file any reply brief in support of his answer 3 by that date. 4 5 6 (3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to the Honorable John C. Coughenour. DATED this 14th day of February, 2019. 7 A 8 9 JAMES P. DONOHUE United States Magistrate Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?