Kinzle v. Glebe
Filing
69
ORDER granting Petitioner's 68 Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner is directed to file his response to respondent's answer no later than 4/15/2019. Respondent's answer (Dkt. 66 ) is RE-NOTED on the Court's calendar for consideration on 4/19/2019. Respondent shall file any reply brief in support of his answer by that date. Signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. (TH)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
JEFFERY M. KINZLE,
Petitioner,
9
10
11
Case No. C14-703-JCC-JPD
v.
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
MIKE OBENLAND,
Respondent.
12
13
14
This is a federal habeas action brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This matter comes
15
before the Court at the present time on petitioner’s motion for an extension of time to file a
16
response to respondent’s answer to petitioner’s third amended federal habeas petition. Petitioner
17
represents to the Court that respondent does not oppose the requested extension. The Court,
18
having considered petitioner’s motion, and the balance of the record, hereby ORDERS as
19
follows:
20
21
(1)
Petitioner’s unopposed motion for extension of time (Dkt. 68) is GRANTED.
Petitioner is directed to file his response to respondent’s answer not later than April 15, 2019.
22
23
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - 1
1
(2)
Respondent’s answer (Dkt. 66) is RE-NOTED on the Court’s calendar for
2
consideration on April 19, 2019. Respondent shall file any reply brief in support of his answer
3
by that date.
4
5
6
(3)
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to
the Honorable John C. Coughenour.
DATED this 14th day of February, 2019.
7
A
8
9
JAMES P. DONOHUE
United States Magistrate Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?