Puget Soundkeeper Alliance v. Rainier Petroleum Corporation
Filing
115
MINUTE ORDER. The Court orders parties to appear for an Evidentiary Hearing and oral argument set for 11/21/2017 at 9:00 AM before Judge James L. Robart regarding Plaintiff Puget Soundkeeper Alliance's motion for civil contempt and sanctions. (Mot. (Dkt. # 101 ).) Authorized by Judge James L. Robart. (TH)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
PUGET SOUNDKEEPER
ALLIANCE,
CASE NO. C14-0829JLR
MINUTE ORDER
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
v.
RAINIER PETROLEUM
CORPORATION,
Defendant.
15
16
17
18
The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable
James L. Robart:
The court ORDERS the parties to appear for an evidentiary hearing and oral
19
argument on Tuesday, November 21, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. regarding Plaintiff Puget
20
Soundkeeper Alliance’s motion for civil contempt and sanctions. (Mot. (Dkt. # 101).)
21
Each party will have 75 minutes to present evidence regarding whether a force majeure
22
event precluded Defendant Rainier Petroleum Corporation (“Rainier”) from complying
MINUTE ORDER - 1
1
with Paragraph 7(f) of the Consent Decree (“Paragraph 7(f)”) (Dkt. # 100) and whether
2
Rainier has substantially complied with Paragraph 7(f). The parties must file witness and
3
exhibit lists no later than Friday, November 17, 2017, at 5:00 p.m. After the presentation
4
of evidence, the court will hear argument from counsel. In addition to other issues the
5
court may address, the court DIRECTS the parties to be prepared to discuss Rainier’s
6
actions towards compliance with Paragraph 7(f) since the time the parties briefed the
7
motion.
8
Filed and entered this 13th day of November, 2017.
9
WILLIAM M. MCCOOL
Clerk of Court
10
s/ Ashleigh Drecktrah
Deputy Clerk
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
MINUTE ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?