Puget Soundkeeper Alliance v. Rainier Petroleum Corporation

Filing 115

MINUTE ORDER. The Court orders parties to appear for an Evidentiary Hearing and oral argument set for 11/21/2017 at 9:00 AM before Judge James L. Robart regarding Plaintiff Puget Soundkeeper Alliance's motion for civil contempt and sanctions. (Mot. (Dkt. # 101 ).) Authorized by Judge James L. Robart. (TH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE, CASE NO. C14-0829JLR MINUTE ORDER 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 v. RAINIER PETROLEUM CORPORATION, Defendant. 15 16 17 18 The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable James L. Robart: The court ORDERS the parties to appear for an evidentiary hearing and oral 19 argument on Tuesday, November 21, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. regarding Plaintiff Puget 20 Soundkeeper Alliance’s motion for civil contempt and sanctions. (Mot. (Dkt. # 101).) 21 Each party will have 75 minutes to present evidence regarding whether a force majeure 22 event precluded Defendant Rainier Petroleum Corporation (“Rainier”) from complying MINUTE ORDER - 1 1 with Paragraph 7(f) of the Consent Decree (“Paragraph 7(f)”) (Dkt. # 100) and whether 2 Rainier has substantially complied with Paragraph 7(f). The parties must file witness and 3 exhibit lists no later than Friday, November 17, 2017, at 5:00 p.m. After the presentation 4 of evidence, the court will hear argument from counsel. In addition to other issues the 5 court may address, the court DIRECTS the parties to be prepared to discuss Rainier’s 6 actions towards compliance with Paragraph 7(f) since the time the parties briefed the 7 motion. 8 Filed and entered this 13th day of November, 2017. 9 WILLIAM M. MCCOOL Clerk of Court 10 s/ Ashleigh Drecktrah Deputy Clerk 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 MINUTE ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?