Umpqua Bank v. Nehring et al

Filing 39

ORDER re plaintiff's 37 Renewed Motion for Default Judgment In Personam & RENEWED filed by Umpqua Bank; Clerk is DIRECTED to enter default judgment consistent with this Order, by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (AD) cc: Robert Nehring

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 UMPQUA BANK, 8 9 10 Plaintiff, C14-879 TSZ v. ORDER ROBERT NEHRING, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 THIS MATTER comes before the Court on plaintiff Umpqua Bank’s renewed 13 motion, docket no. 37, for default judgment against in personam defendant Robert 14 Nehring. Plaintiff was previously granted partial default judgment, docket no. 19, 15 pursuant to which the Preferred Mortgage on in rem defendant M/Y FANTA SEAS, 16 Official No. 1166172, was foreclosed and the vessel was ordered to be sold at public 17 auction. At the time such partial default judgment was entered, the amount remaining 18 due on the Promissory Note underlying the Preferred Mortgage at issue was $120,417.27, 19 inclusive of interest as of December 9, 2014. The vessel was purchased at public auction 20 by a third party for $20,250. See Process Receipt and Return (docket no. 20). Plaintiff 21 previously moved for default judgment against Nehring, seeking to use the net amount of 22 23 ORDER - 1 1 the auction proceeds ($19,911.84) in calculating the deficiency owed by Nehring. The 2 Court denied the earlier motion because the record did not provide a basis for the Court to 3 confirm the public sale. See Minute Order (docket no. 36). 4 In connection with the renewed motion for default judgment now before the Court, 5 plaintiff has submitted a Marine Survey Report dated February 10, 2015, indicating that 6 the fair market value of the M/Y FANTA SEAS in its then current condition was between 7 $40,000 and $50,000. See Ex. A to Glowney Decl. (docket no. 38-1). Plaintiff proposes, 8 and the Court agrees, to use the midpoint of this range ($45,000) in calculating the 9 deficiency owed by Nehring. Plaintiff, however, has computed the deficiency by 10 beginning with a different balance (i) than was stated in the partial default judgment 11 pursuant to which the M/Y FANTA SEAS was sold, and (ii) that is based in part on fees 12 and charges for which no documentary support has been provided. See Ex. C to Nichols 13 Decl. (docket no. 34).1 The Court is not persuaded that plaintiff has accurately recited the 14 deficiency owed by Nehring. 15 The Court calculates the amount of the deficiency by subtracting from the amount 16 remaining due at the time the Preferred Mortgage was foreclosed ($120,417.27) the 17 estimated fair market value of the vessel at the time of its sale ($45,000), and adding the 18 fees and costs associated with the public auction ($3,523.13), see Minute Order at 1 n.1 19 (docket no. 26). Plaintiff will be awarded $78,940.40, together with attorney’s fees in the 20 Moreover, 21 Exhibit C of the total stated in Paragraph 9 of Nichols’s declaration does not match the total shown in is Nichols’s declaration, and the amount listed in Exhibit C for moorage expenses ($11,258) 1 substantially more than the amount disclosed to the Court ($1,458) in connection with plaintiff’s motion 22 for disbursement of the net proceeds of the auction. 23 ORDER - 2 1 amount of $20,595.00 and costs to be taxed in the manner set forth in Local Civil 2 Rule 54(d). Interest shall accrue at the annual rate set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1961 from the 3 date on which plaintiff’s renewed motion for default judgment was filed, March 4, 2016, 4 until paid in full. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter default judgment consistent with this 5 Order in favor of plaintiff and against Nehring, to send a copy of this Order to all counsel 6 of record, as well as to Robert Nehring at 4727 136th Place SW, Edmonds, Washington 7 98026, and to close this case. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated this 6th day of April, 2016. 10 A 11 12 Thomas S. Zilly United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?