Trueblood, et al v. Washington State Department of Health and Human Services et al
Filing
1143
ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION re Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. No. 1118 ) and Joint Motion For Approval of Settlement Agreement (Dkt. No. 1131 ). Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (KRA)
1
2
3
4
5
6
The Honorable MARSHA J. PECHMAN
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
NO. 2:14-cv-01178-MJP
CASSIE CORDELL TRUEBLOOD, next friend
of A.B., an incapacitated person, et al.,
[REVISED PROPOSED]
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER ON MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
THE WASHINGTON STATE
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH
SERVICES, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration of
18
this Court’s Order at Dkt. No. 1115. The Court has considered the Parties’ pleadings and the
19
Court’s file, including the Court’s most recent Order on Good Cause Exceptions (GCEs) at Dkt.
20
No. 1135, as well as information provided to the Court at the most recent status hearing held in
21
this matter. Accordingly, and with the Court being fully advised, the Court does hereby:
ORDER
22
23
1) The Department may file motions with this Court to request reductions in fines owed
24
for GCEs. Requests for such reductions in fines may look back in time, but not more
25
than six months. The Department is no longer bound by the one month time limit at
26
Dkt. No. 1115 at 6.
[REVISED PROPOSED]
ORDER ON MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
1
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON
7141 Cleanwater Dr SW
PO Box 40124
Olympia, WA 98504-0124
(360) 586-6565
1
a. These motions may be brought to seek either system wide audit type
2
accounting adjustments, or patient level adjustments to fines for good cause.
3
b. These motions are not necessary for the Department’s regular monthly fine
4
reporting and adjustments made through that process and as data settles.
5
c. The Parties shall meet and confer prior to these motions being filed, and the
6
motions shall indicate for each claimed GCE that Plaintiffs have been
7
consulted and whether Plaintiffs agree that the Court’s criteria for GCE have
8
been met.
9
2) Notwithstanding this six month look back limitation and recognizing that some
10
requests for reductions in fines have been pending before this Court, the Department
11
may do a one-time extended look back, and request reductions in fines going back to
12
January of 2024.
13
3) The Department must include Court-approved reductions in fines in subsequent
14
monthly fines reporting declarations, so that these amounts may be reduced to
15
Judgement along with month fines amounts.
16
17
4) This Order terminates Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. No. 1118) and
Joint Motion For Approval of Settlement Agreement (Dkt. No. 1131).
18
The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to all counsel.
19
Dated this 5th day of August, 2024
20
A
21
22
MARSHA J. PECHMAN
UNITED STATES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
23
24
25
26
[REVISED PROPOSED]
ORDER ON MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
2
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON
7141 Cleanwater Dr SW
PO Box 40124
Olympia, WA 98504-0124
(360) 586-6565
1
Presented by:
2
ROBERT W. FERGUSON
Attorney General
3
4
5
6
7
8
/s/ Marko Pavela
DANIEL J. JUDGE, WSBA No. 17392
Senior Counsel
MARKO PAVELA, WSBA No. 49160
ANTHONY VAUPEL, WSBA No. 47848
TRAVIS KUHNS, WSBA No. 53219
Assistant Attorneys General
Attorneys for Defendants
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
/s/Chloe Merino
Chloe Merino, WSBA No. 60071
Disability Rights Washington
315 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 850
Seattle, WA 98104
(206) 324-1521
chloem@dr-wa.org
/S/Christopher Carney
Christopher Carney, WSBA No. 30325
Kimberly Mosolf, WSBA No. 49548
Carney Gillespie PLLP
600 1st Avenue, Suite LL08
Seattle, Washington 98104
(206) 445-0212
Christopher.Carney@carneygillespie.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
[REVISED PROPOSED]
ORDER ON MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
3
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON
7141 Cleanwater Dr SW
PO Box 40124
Olympia, WA 98504-0124
(360) 586-6565
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?