Taamu v. City of Everett

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 7 Report and Recommendations, by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. The Court, having reviewed petitioners petition for writ of habeas corpus, the Report and Recommendation of Mary Alice Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge, and the remaining record, does hereby find and Order: (1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation; (2) Petitioners habeas petition is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice; (3) Petitioner is DENIED issuance of a certificate of appealability, and (4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner and to Judge Theiler. (cc: Petitioner)(SA)

Download PDF
01 02 03 04 05 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 06 07 08 BRANDIA TAAMU, 09 10 11 12 ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) CITY OF EVERETT, ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________ ) CASE NO. C14-1271-RSM ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S HABEAS PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE 13 The Court, having reviewed petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, the Report 14 15 and Recommendation of Mary Alice Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge, and the 16 remaining record, does hereby find and Order: 17 (1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation; 18 (2) Petitioner’s habeas petition is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED, without 19 prejudice; 20 (3) Petitioner is DENIED issuance of a certificate of appealability, and 21 / / / 22 / / / ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S HABEAS PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE PAGE -1 01 02 03 (4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner and to Judge Theiler. DATED this 13th day of November, 2014. 04 05 /s/ Ricardo S. Martinez____ RICARDO S. MARTINEZ United States District Judge 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S HABEAS PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE PAGE -2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?