Eggum v. Uttecht

Filing 92

ORDER granting Petitioner's 82 Motion to Appoint Counsel, The Court appoints Assistant Federal Public Defender Ann Wagner to represent petitioner in these proceedings ; the stay in this matter is TEMPORARILY LIFTED ; RENOTING to 6/9/2017 Peti tioner's 91 MOTION to file Supplemental Brief/NOTICE of Intent to Seek Appointment, Response due 6/5/2017, Reply due 6/9/2017 ; by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Marlow Eggum, Prisoner ID: 879587)(SWT) Modified on 5/17/2017 (SWT). (cc Ann Wagner via email)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 MARLOW TODD EGGUM, Petitioner, 10 11 Case No. C14-1328-RAJ-MAT Respondent. 9 ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL, TEMPORARILY LIFTING STAY, AND DIRECTING RESPONSE FROM RESPONDENT v. JEFFERY UTTECHT, 12 13 14 This is a federal habeas action filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 26, 2016, the Court 15 entered a stay pending resolution of petitioner’s state court proceedings. (See Dkt. 63.) On January 16 18, 2017, petitioner moved for appointment of counsel. (Dkt. 82.) The Court referred the matter 17 to the Office of the Federal Public Defender (“FPD”) for review. (Dkt. 83.) On May 12, 2017, 18 the FPD notified the Court of its intent to seek appointment in this matter. (Dkt. 91.) The FPD 19 also asked the Court to lift the stay to allow it to file a supplemental brief in support of petitioner’s 20 habeas petition. (Id.) Based on the foregoing, the Court finds and ORDERS: 21 (1) Because of the complex issues involved in this case, appointment of counsel would 22 serve the interest of justice. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). As required by statute, petitioner 23 has demonstrated financial eligibility. (Dkt. 91-1.) Accordingly, petitioner’s motion to appoint ORDER - 1 1 counsel (Dkt. 82) is GRANTED. The Court appoints Assistant Federal Public Defender Ann 2 Wagner to represent petitioner in these proceedings. 3 4 5 (2) The stay in this matter (Dkt. 63) is TEMPORARILY LIFTED to allow for briefing and ruling on petitioner’s motion to file a supplemental brief (Dkt. 91). (3) Respondent shall file a response to petitioner’s motion to file a supplemental brief 6 by June 5, 2017. In addition to addressing petitioner’s motion, respondent shall address the 7 continued appropriateness of the scope of the stay entered on April 26, 2016. Specifically, is it 8 still necessary to stay this matter pending completion of Washington Court of Appeals Cause Nos. 9 74284-1, 72194-1, 74621-9, and any other state-court actions petitioner files that are related to his 10 2009 criminal case and this federal habeas action, or could this action proceed at an earlier time? 11 12 13 (4) Petitioner shall file a reply by June 9, 2017, that also addresses the continued appropriateness of the scope of the stay entered on April 26, 2016. (5) The Clerk is directed to NOTE petitioner’s motion to file a supplemental brief (Dkt. 14 91) for June 9, 2017, and direct copies of this Order to the parties and to the Honorable Richard 15 A. Jones. 16 DATED this 17th day of May, 2017. 17 A 18 Mary Alice Theiler United States Magistrate Judge 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?