Eggum v. Uttecht

Filing 99

ORDER RE: VARIOUS MOTIONS AND ORDERING PETITIONER TO FILE AN AMENDED HABEAS PETITION denying petitioner's 91 Motion for leave to file a supplemental brief but grants him leave to file an amended petition within 30 days; granting petitioner's 97 Motion to strike respondent's surreply 96 signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler.(RS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 MARLOW TODD EGGUM, Petitioner, 9 10 11 Case No. C14-1328-RAJ-MAT ORDER RE: VARIOUS MOTIONS AND ORDERING PETITIONER TO FILE AN AMENDED HABEAS PETITION v. JEFFREY UTTECHT, Respondent. 12 13 14 This is a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas action. On April 26, 2016, the Court entered a stay 15 pending resolution of petitioner’s state court proceedings. (See Dkt. 63.) On January 18, 2017, 16 petitioner moved for appointment of counsel. (Dkt. 82.) The Court referred the matter to the 17 Office of the Federal Public Defender (“FPD”) for review. (Dkt. 83.) On May 12, 2017, the FPD 18 notified the Court of its intent to seek appointment in this matter. (Dkt. 91.) The FPD also asked 19 the Court to lift the stay to allow it to file a supplemental brief in support of petitioner’s habeas 20 petition. (Id.) 21 The Court appointed the FPD to represent petitioner and temporarily lifted the stay to allow 22 for briefing on his motion to file a supplemental brief. (Dkt. 92.) The Court also directed the 23 parties to address the status of petitioner’s state court proceedings. (Id.) The parties filed briefs ORDER RE: VARIOUS MOTIONS AND ORDERING PETITIONER TO FILE AN AMENDED HABEAS PETITION - 1 1 as directed by the Court (Dkts. 93 & 94), and respondent filed a surreply (Dkt. 96). Petitioner then 2 filed a motion to strike respondent’s surreply. (Dkt. 97.) Respondent did not file a response. 3 Having considered the record and the governing law, the Court finds and ORDERS: 4 (1) Petitioner has two pending actions in the state courts, Washington Court of Appeals 5 Cause Numbers 74284-1 and 75189-1. Respondent argues that this case should be stayed until 6 both are closed. Petitioner maintains there is no present need for a stay. The Court agrees with 7 petitioner. Cause Number 74284-1 does not challenge petitioner’s conviction or sentence; it seeks 8 transcription of voir dire and opening statements. (Dkt. 95-1.) Petitioner’s habeas claims do not 9 challenge voir dire or opening statements, and therefore it does not appear that resolution of Cause 10 Number 74284-1 will affect this habeas action. Cause Number 75189-1 is final for all practical 11 purposes. Although it has not been administratively closed, the deadline for petitioner to file a 12 motion to modify has passed. In sum, the currently pending state court actions do not prevent the 13 Court from moving forward with this federal habeas action. 14 (2) Petitioner moves to strike respondent’s surreply. (Dkt. 97.) The Court’s order 15 setting the briefing schedule on the motion to file a supplemental brief did not authorize the 16 surreply, and respondent did not ask for permission to file. Because the surreply was filed in 17 violation of the Court’s briefing schedule and Local Rule LCR 7, petitioner’s motion to strike (Dkt. 18 97) is GRANTED, and respondent’s surreply (Dkt. 96) is STRICKEN. 19 (3) Petitioner moves for leave to file a supplemental brief to address and clarify the 20 complex procedural history and numerous issues raised in the petition. (Dkt. 91.) Petitioner 21 intends to argue that his incarceration on two counts of intimidating a public servant is 22 fundamentally unconstitutional and contrary to clearly established federal law in Virginia v. Black, 23 538 U.S. 343, 360 (2003). (Dkt. 95 at 1.) He wishes to ask the State to waive the exhaustion ORDER RE: VARIOUS MOTIONS AND ORDERING PETITIONER TO FILE AN AMENDED HABEAS PETITION - 2 1 requirement for this claim. (Id. at 1-2.) If the State will not waive, he intends to file a successive 2 personal restraint petition directly in the Washington Supreme Court and ask this Court to reinstate 3 the stay. (Id.) 4 This case has a complex procedural history and petitioner’s pro se petition includes 26 5 grounds for relief, some of which include sub-claims. The Court would benefit from clarification 6 from petitioner’s recently appointed counsel. An amended habeas petition, however, would be 7 more beneficial to the Court than a supplemental brief.1 Accordingly, the Court DENIES 8 petitioner’s motion for leave to file a supplemental brief (Dkt. 91), but GRANTS him leave to file 9 an amended petition that clarifies and consolidates his federal habeas claims. 10 (4) Within 30 days of the date this Order is signed, petitioner shall file an amended 11 habeas petition that complies with the requirements of Rule 2 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 12 Cases. Petitioner is advised that his amended petition will operate as a complete substitute for his 13 original petition. 14 In granting petitioner leave to file an amended petition to clarify and consolidate his federal 15 habeas claims, the Court does not intend to authorize petitioner to add new claims. If petitioner 16 wishes to do so, he must file a motion asking for leave from the Court. 17 (5) If petitioner’s amended habeas petition includes unexhausted claims that petitioner 18 intends to bring to the state courts, petitioner shall file a motion to stay this action at the same time 19 he files his amended habeas petition. 20 21 22 23 1 To the extent petitioner’s counsel seeks to use the supplemental brief as an avenue for convincing the State to waive exhaustion, the Court sees no barrier to the attorneys communicating directly about this issue, without involving the Court. ORDER RE: VARIOUS MOTIONS AND ORDERING PETITIONER TO FILE AN AMENDED HABEAS PETITION - 3 (6) Any motions must be noted on the Court’s calendar in accordance with Local Rule 3 (7) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this order to the parties and to the Honorable 4 Richard A. Jones. 1 2 5 LCR 7. Dated this 30th day of June, 2017. 6 A 7 Mary Alice Theiler United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER RE: VARIOUS MOTIONS AND ORDERING PETITIONER TO FILE AN AMENDED HABEAS PETITION - 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?