Liu v. Colvin
Filing
24
ORDER for Attorney's Fees re Plaintiff's 23 Motion, signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SWT)(Nancy Berryhill added. Carolyn Colvin terminated.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
8
9
ZAO LIN LIU,
10
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
vs.
NANCY BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
14
15
)
) CIVIL NO. 2:14-cv-01389-RSM
)
) ORDER FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES
) PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)
)
)
)
)
Defe)
ndant.
16
THIS MATTER having come on regularly before the undersigned upon Plaintiff’s Motion
17
For Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C.§ 406(b), the Court having considered the contentions
18
of Plaintiff and Defendant, good cause having been shown for entry of the Order, now therefore,
19
20
21
22
23
it is hereby
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s attorney Elie Halpern is awarded a gross attorney’s fee of
$6,595.73 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), reduced by the EAJA fees of $4,675.48 that previously
were awarded, leaving a net fee of $1,920.25. When issuing the 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) check for
24
25
ORDER FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES PURSUANT TO 42
U.S.C. § 406(b) - 1
Halpern Olivares PLLC
2102 Carriage Drive SW, Building E102
Olympia, WA 98502
(360) 753-8055, Fax: (360) 753-8584
Ehalpern7379@gmail.com
1
payment to Plaintiff’s attorney herein, Social Security is directed to send to Plaintiff’s attorney the
2
net balance of $1920.25, minus any applicable processing fees as allowed by statute
3
DATED this 14 day of August, 2018.
4
A
5
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
Presented by:
10
11
12
Elie Halpern____________
Elie Halpern, WSB No. 1519
Attorney for Plaintiff
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
ORDER FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES PURSUANT TO 42
U.S.C. § 406(b) - 2
Halpern Olivares PLLC
2102 Carriage Drive SW, Building E102
Olympia, WA 98502
(360) 753-8055, Fax: (360) 753-8584
Ehalpern7379@gmail.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?