Stark v. Russell

Filing 64

AMENDED MINUTE ORDER re 63 Minute Order. Petitioner has until August 19, 2020, to file his notice of appeal of the Court's order and judgment dismissing his habeas petition (Dkt. No. 60 , 61 ). Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)

Download PDF
Case 2:14-cv-01538-JCC Document 64 Filed 07/16/20 Page 1 of 2 THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 BRIAN THOMAS STARK, 10 Petitioner, AMENDED MINUTE ORDER v. 11 12 CASE NO. C14-1538-JCC DANIEL WHITE, 13 Respondent. 14 15 16 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C. Coughenour, United States District Judge: 17 This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ stipulation and proposed order 18 extending the time to file a notice of appeal (Dkt. No. 62). On June 25, 2020, the Court adopted 19 the report and recommendation of the Honorable Michelle L. Peterson, United States Magistrate 20 Judge, dismissed Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and granted Petitioner a 21 certificate of appealability (“COA”) as to some of his claims. (Dkt. No. 60.) The Court entered 22 judgment the same day. (Dkt. No. 61.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 23 4(a)(5)(A), the Court finds good cause and GRANTS the request for an extension of time to file 24 an appeal (Dkt. No. 62). Petitioner has until August 19, 2020, to file his notice of appeal of the 25 Court’s order and judgment dismissing his habeas petition (Dkt. No. 60, 61). 26 // AMENDED MINUTE ORDER C14-1538-JCC PAGE - 1 Case 2:14-cv-01538-JCC Document 64 Filed 07/16/20 Page 2 of 2 1 DATED this 16th day of July 2020. 2 William M. McCool Clerk of Court 3 s/Tomas Hernandez Deputy Clerk 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 AMENDED MINUTE ORDER C14-1538-JCC PAGE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?