Stark v. Russell
Filing
64
AMENDED MINUTE ORDER re 63 Minute Order. Petitioner has until August 19, 2020, to file his notice of appeal of the Court's order and judgment dismissing his habeas petition (Dkt. No. 60 , 61 ). Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
Case 2:14-cv-01538-JCC Document 64 Filed 07/16/20 Page 1 of 2
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
BRIAN THOMAS STARK,
10
Petitioner,
AMENDED MINUTE ORDER
v.
11
12
CASE NO. C14-1538-JCC
DANIEL WHITE,
13
Respondent.
14
15
16
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C.
Coughenour, United States District Judge:
17
This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ stipulation and proposed order
18
extending the time to file a notice of appeal (Dkt. No. 62). On June 25, 2020, the Court adopted
19
the report and recommendation of the Honorable Michelle L. Peterson, United States Magistrate
20
Judge, dismissed Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and granted Petitioner a
21
certificate of appealability (“COA”) as to some of his claims. (Dkt. No. 60.) The Court entered
22
judgment the same day. (Dkt. No. 61.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure
23
4(a)(5)(A), the Court finds good cause and GRANTS the request for an extension of time to file
24
an appeal (Dkt. No. 62). Petitioner has until August 19, 2020, to file his notice of appeal of the
25
Court’s order and judgment dismissing his habeas petition (Dkt. No. 60, 61).
26
//
AMENDED MINUTE ORDER
C14-1538-JCC
PAGE - 1
Case 2:14-cv-01538-JCC Document 64 Filed 07/16/20 Page 2 of 2
1
DATED this 16th day of July 2020.
2
William M. McCool
Clerk of Court
3
s/Tomas Hernandez
Deputy Clerk
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
AMENDED MINUTE ORDER
C14-1538-JCC
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?