Lundquist v. State of Washington et al

Filing 35

ORDER denying plaintiff's 28 Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissing action by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(PM)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

7
8
9
10
11
12

_______________________________________
)
TODD ERICK LUNDQUIST,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________)

Case No. C14-1785RSL
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING
ACTION

13
14

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s “Motion for Summary Judgment on

15

Liability for Conversion.” Dkt. # 28. Plaintiff’s conversion claim is barred by all potentially-

16

applicable statutes of limitation. As discussed more fully in this Court’s “Order Granting

17

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment” (Dkt. # 34), defendants’ allegedly wrongful acts

18

occurred in 2006, and they have done nothing within the limitations period that could give rise to

19

a conversion claim. The continuing ill effects of the allegedly wrongful conduct does not trigger

20

a new limitations period. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is therefore DENIED, and the

21

Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiff.

22
23
24
25
26

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND DISMISSING ACTION

1

Dated this 21st day of August, 2015.

2
3

A

4

Robert S. Lasnik

5

United States District Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND DISMISSING ACTION

-2-