Shore et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al

Filing 6

ORDER OF DISMISSAL dismissing case for failure to pay the filing fee or submit an IFP application. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM) cc: plaintiffs via first class mail

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 MATTHEW JAMES LINDSAY SHORE, et al., Case No. C14-1817RSM ORDER OF DISMISSAL Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORP, et al., Defendants. 17 On January 27, 2015, the Court in this matter issued an Order adopting the Report and 18 Recommendation of the Honorable Mary Alice Theiler and denying Plaintiffs’ in forma pauperis 19 20 (“IFP”) application. Dkt. #5. Plaintiffs were directed to file an IFP application satisfying the 21 Court’s requirements no later than December 26, 2014, but failed to do so. Id. Plaintiffs were 22 directed to pay the full filing fee within thirty days of January 27, 2015, but failed to do so. See 23 Docket. Plaintiffs were informed that if the filing fee was not paid, this case would be dismissed 24 25 26 27 and closed. Id. Plaintiffs have taken no further action in this case. Considering all of the above, and the remainder of the record, the Court concludes that dismissal of this case is warranted for failure to pay the filing fee or submit an IFP application. 28 ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 1 1 Accordingly, the Court hereby finds and ORDERS: 2 (1) This matter is DISMISSED. 3 (2) This case is now CLOSED. 4 5 6 DATED this 10th day of January, 2018. 7 8 A 9 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?