Shore et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
Filing
6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL dismissing case for failure to pay the filing fee or submit an IFP application. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM) cc: plaintiffs via first class mail
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
MATTHEW JAMES LINDSAY SHORE, et
al.,
Case No. C14-1817RSM
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiffs,
v.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORP,
et al.,
Defendants.
17
On January 27, 2015, the Court in this matter issued an Order adopting the Report and
18
Recommendation of the Honorable Mary Alice Theiler and denying Plaintiffs’ in forma pauperis
19
20
(“IFP”) application. Dkt. #5. Plaintiffs were directed to file an IFP application satisfying the
21
Court’s requirements no later than December 26, 2014, but failed to do so. Id. Plaintiffs were
22
directed to pay the full filing fee within thirty days of January 27, 2015, but failed to do so. See
23
Docket. Plaintiffs were informed that if the filing fee was not paid, this case would be dismissed
24
25
26
27
and closed. Id. Plaintiffs have taken no further action in this case.
Considering all of the above, and the remainder of the record, the Court concludes that
dismissal of this case is warranted for failure to pay the filing fee or submit an IFP application.
28
ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 1
1
Accordingly, the Court hereby finds and ORDERS:
2
(1)
This matter is DISMISSED.
3
(2)
This case is now CLOSED.
4
5
6
DATED this 10th day of January, 2018.
7
8
A
9
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?