Sitthivong v. Obenland
Filing
37
ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENTS' 36 MOTION TO LIFT STAY: Within forty-five (45) days, Respondent shall file and serve an answer in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in United States District Courts. Signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. **3 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Felix Sitthivong, Prisoner ID: 354579)(MW)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
FELIX VINCENT SITTHIVONG,
Petitioner,
9
10
11
Case No. C14-1876-RSL-MLP
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
LIFT STAY
v.
MIKE OBENLAND,
Respondent.
12
13
14
In April 2015, the Court stayed this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas action so that Petitioner
15
could exhaust his state remedies. Petitioner’s state-court proceedings have concluded, and
16
therefore Respondent asks the Court to lift the stay and set a briefing schedule. Having
17
considered Respondent’s motion and the balance of the record, the Court ORDERS:
18
(1)
Respondent’s motion (dkt. # 36) is GRANTED, and the stay (dkt. # 14) is lifted.
19
(2)
Within forty-five (45) days, Respondent shall file and serve an answer in
20
accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in United States District
21
Courts. As part of such answer, Respondent shall state whether Petitioner has exhausted
22
available state remedies and whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary. Respondent shall not
23
file a dispositive motion in place of an answer without first showing cause as to why an answer is
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO LIFT STAY - 1
1
inadequate. Respondent shall file the answer with the Clerk of the Court and serve a copy of the
2
answer on Petitioner.
3
(3)
The answer will be treated in accordance with LCR 7. Accordingly, on the face of
4
the answer, Respondent shall note it for consideration on the fourth Friday after filing. Petitioner
5
may file and serve a response not later than the Monday immediately preceding the Friday
6
designated for consideration of the matter, and Respondent may file and serve a reply not later
7
than the Friday designated for consideration.
8
(4)
Filing by Parties, Generally
9
All attorneys admitted to practice before this Court are required to file documents
10
electronically via the Court’s CM/ECF system. Petitioner shall file all documents electronically.
11
All filings must indicate in the upper right hand corner the name of the magistrate judge to whom
12
the document is directed.
13
Any document filed with the Court must be accompanied by proof that it has been served
14
upon all parties that have entered a notice of appearance in the underlying matter. Petitioner shall
15
indicate the date the document is submitted for e-filing as the date of service.
16
(5)
Motions
17
Any request for court action shall be set forth in a motion, properly filed and served.
18
Pursuant to LCR 7(b), any argument being offered in support of a motion shall be submitted as a
19
part of the motion itself and not in a separate document. The motion shall include in its caption
20
(immediately below the title of the motion) a designation of the date the motion is to be noted for
21
consideration on the Court’s motion calendar.
22
23
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO LIFT STAY - 2
1
(6)
2
No direct communication is to take place with the District Judge or Magistrate Judge with
3
4
5
6
Direct Communications with District Judge or Magistrate Judge
regard to this case. All relevant information and papers are to be directed to the Clerk.
(7)
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this order to the parties and to the
Honorable Robert S. Lasnik.
Dated this 28th day of April, 2020.
A
7
8
MICHELLE L. PETERSON
United States Magistrate Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO LIFT STAY - 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?