Sitthivong v. Obenland
Filing
62
ORDER granting Petitioner's 58 Fifth Motion for Extension of Time. The Clerk of Court is directed to renote the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. # 43 ) on the Court's calendar for May 6, 2022. Petitioner's objections, if any, are due on or before April 15, 2022. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Felix Sitthivong, Prisoner ID: 354579)(LH)
Case 2:14-cv-01876-RSL Document 62 Filed 02/07/22 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
9
FELIX VINCENT SITTHIVONG,
Petitioner,
10
v.
11
12
MIKE OBENLAND,
Case No. C14-1876-RSL
ORDER GRANTING
PETITIONER’S FIFTH
MOTION FOR AN
EXTENSION OF TIME
Respondent.
13
14
15
This matter comes before the Court on petitioner’s fifth motion for an extension of time
16 in which to file objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Michelle L.
17 Peterson, United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. # 58). Petitioner filed four previous requests for
18 extensions of time in which to file objections to this Report and Recommendation, Dkts. # 44,
19 # 46, # 49, # 53, and the Court granted petitioner additional time, Dkts. # 45, # 48, # 52, # 57.
20 As a result of the Court’s most recent extension of time, petitioner had approximately eleven
21 months to file objections. Approximately four months have passed since petitioner’s objections
22 were due.
23
The government responds that the Court should deny petitioner’s motion because
24 petitioner has already received numerous extensions to file his objections and provides no
25 compelling reason why he should obtain another extension. Dkt. # 60. Petitioner’s motion,
26 written on September 9, 2021, and filed on September 16, 2021, reflects that, at the time of his
27 writing, (i) his law library access was restricted due to COVID-19 protocols, (ii) he lacked
28 access to other prisoners with more legal knowledge than him, (iii) he contracted COVID-19
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S FIFTH
MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME - 1
Case 2:14-cv-01876-RSL Document 62 Filed 02/07/22 Page 2 of 2
1 and was placed in isolation without access to legal documents for multiple weeks and then
2 housed in the gym without access to legal documents before being returned to his unit where he
3 could access legal documents, (iv) he lost access to relevant court documents when fellow
4 prisoners who were holding them on his behalf were transferred, and it took time to coordinate
5 with a loved one to obtain new copies, (v) he has been deprived of his property and legal
6 documents since August 4, 2021 due to his facility transfer caused by recent prison closures, 1
7 and (vi) he expected a further transfer in the next phase of prison closures, and he indicated that
8 this transfer may likewise restrict his access to legal paperwork. Dkt. # 58.
9
Given that petitioner’s transition from one facility to another inhibited his ability to
10 prepare objections, and this inability remained ongoing as of the date he prepared his motion,
11 the Court will grant an additional 180-day extension for him to file objections. However, given
12 the number of extensions petitioner has been granted, and the length of time petitioner has had
13 to file objections, the Court notes that this is almost certainly the last such extension that the
14 Court will grant petitioner.
15
For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court hereby GRANTS petitioner’s motion (Dkt.
16 # 58) by providing him an additional 180-day extension of time in which to file objections. The
17 Clerk of Court is directed to renote the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. # 43) on the Court’s
18 calendar for May 6, 2022. Petitioner’s objections, if any, are due on or before April 15, 2022.
19
20
DATED this 7th day of February, 2022.
A
Robert S. Lasnik
21
22
United States District Judge
23
24
25
26
27
1
The Court notes that it granted petitioner’s fourth motion for an extension of time in part
28 because this transfer inhibited his ability to prepare objections.
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S FIFTH
MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?