Ganje v. Colvin
Filing
7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge J Richard Creatura. Show Cause Response due by 11/13/2015. (SH)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
7
8
9
JOSEPH GANJE,
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
13
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of the Social Security
Administration,
CASE NO. 2:15-cv-0074 JRC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
THIS MATTER SHOULD NOT
BE DISMISSED
Defendant.
14
15
This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73 and
16
17
18
Local Magistrate Judge Rule MJR 13 (see also Notice of Initial Assignment to a U.S.
Magistrate Judge and Consent Form, Dkt. 2; Consent to Proceed Before a United States
19 Magistrate Judge, Dkt. 4).
20
Because there is no evidence in the record that this case has been served properly
21 as to all relevant entities, the Court hereby orders plaintiff to provide proof of service or
22 show cause by November 13, 2015 why this matter should not be dismissed for lack of
23 prosecution.
24
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS MATTER
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED - 1
1
2
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This case was filed in this Court on January 16, 2015 (Dkt. 1). An Affidavit of
3 Service (Dkt. 6) was filed on January 29, 2015 informing the Court that the Summons
4
5
and Complaint had been served, but only as to defendant, CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. A Notice of Appearance
6
(Dkt. 5) on behalf of defendant was filed on January 29, 2015.
7
STANDARD
8
9
10
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i) governs service with respect to complaints against the United
States and against United States agencies, officers and employees. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
11 4(i); see also Villegas v. Astrue, No. 12-cv-1585, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55223 at *1-*2
12 (C.D. Cal. April 18, 2012) (unpublished opinion) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)).
13 Regarding social security complaints, “Rule 4(i) requires plaintiff to serve a summons
14 and copy of complaint on the following entities: (a) the United States attorney for the
15 district in which the action is brought or to an assistant United States attorney or clerical
16 employee designated by the United States attorney in a writing filed with the clerk of
17
18
court or the civil process clerk at the office of the United States attorney; (b) the Attorney
General of the United States at Washington, District of Columbia; and (c) the officer or
19
agency.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i). In addition, Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l) requires proof of service to
20
be filed or made to the court.
21
22
23
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) requires the court to provide notice to plaintiff before the
matter may be dismissed for lack of prosecution, and Rule 4(i)(4) requires the court to
24 allow a reasonable time for plaintiff to cure a failure to serve multiple entities, if plaintiff
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS MATTER
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED - 2
1 has effected service on either the United States attorney or the Attorney General of the
2 United States.
3
4
5
DISCUSSION
Here, it appears from the record that only defendant, CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, has been served in this case.
6
However, Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i) requires multiple entities to be served with respect to cases
7
against agencies of the United States, including the United States attorney and the
8
9
10
Attorney General of the United States. Therefore, plaintiff has failed to comply with this
Rule and failed to prosecute this matter properly, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i), or has failed to
11 provide proof of service to the Court, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l).
12
CONCLUSION
13
Plaintiff is ordered to provide proof of service or show cause why this matter
14 should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution by November 13, 2015. Failure to
15 provide proof of service within this time period or show cause within this time period
16 shall result in an order dismissing this action.
17
Dated this 23rd day of October, 2015.
18
A
19
20
J. Richard Creatura
United States Magistrate Judge
21
22
23
24
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS MATTER
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED - 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?