Piersawl v. United States of America et al
Filing
56
MINUTE ORDER by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour granting Defendants Vincent Tang, M.D. and AMN Healthcare, Inc.'s 51 Motion for Summary Judgment. All claims against Defendants Tang and AMN Healthcare are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. (PM)
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
10
CAROLYN E PIERSAWL, as Personal
Representative of the Estate of WILLIAM
T. PIERSAWL,
Plaintiff,
11
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
MINUTE ORDER DISMISSING
DEFENDANTS TANG AND AMN
HEALTHCARE
v.
12
13
CASE NO. C15-0154-JCC
Defendants.
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C.
Coughenour, United States District Judge:
This matter comes before the Court on the motion for summary judgment of Defendants
Vincent Tang, M.D. and AMN Healthcare, Inc (Dkt. No. 51). In their motion, Defendants argued
that Plaintiff’s case against them should be dismissed for failure to present the requisite expert
medical testimony to support her medical malpractice claims. (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff did not contest
the motion or submit expert testimony in response. (Dkt. No. 53 at 1.) No remaining party
objects to the dismissal of Defendants Tang and AMN Healthcare. (Dkt. No. 54 at 2.)
Accordingly, the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 51) is GRANTED. All
claims against Defendants Tang and AMN Healthcare are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.
//
//
MINUTE ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS
TANG AND AMN HEALTHCARE, C15-0154-JCC
PAGE - 1
1
DATED this 18th day of November 2016.
2
William M. McCool
Clerk of Court
3
/s/Paula McNabb
Deputy Clerk
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
MINUTE ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS
TANG AND AMN HEALTHCARE, C15-0154-JCC
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?