Lopez et al v. United States Secret Service
Filing
44
ORDER re 43 Joint Status Report. Until Ms. Johnson appears as counsel of record pursuant to LCR 83.2(a), documents filed by her on plaintiff's behalf will not be considered. A case management order based on defense counsel's representations in the joint status report will be issued. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Donna Johnston ad hoc; NEF regenerated)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
_______________________________________
)
RAUL LOPEZ, JR.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
v.
)
)
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_______________________________________)
Case No. C15-0243RSL
ORDER
12
13
This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On April 17, 2018, the parties submitted a
14
joint status report that was signed by Donna Johnston as attorney for plaintiff. Dkt. # 43 at 6. Ms.
15
Johnston has not filed a notice of appearance in this action: the docket reflects that plaintiff is
16
represented by Philip Mahoney. Chambers staff called Ms. Johnston to advise her of the
17
discrepancy and was told that Ms. Johnston would enter an appearance and that Mr. Mahoney
18
would be withdrawing as counsel of record. No further action has been taken.
At present, plaintiff is represented by Mr. Mahoney and only Mr. Mahoney. Until Ms.
19
20
Johnston appears as counsel of record pursuant to LCR 83.2(a), documents filed by her on
21
plaintiff’s behalf will not be considered. A case management order based on defense counsel’s
22
representations in the joint status report will be issued.
23
Dated this 3rd day of May, 2018.
A
Robert S. Lasnik
24
25
United States District Judge
26
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?