Lopez et al v. United States Secret Service

Filing 50

ORDER granting defendant's 46 Motion to Compel Discovery Responses, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Raul Lopez, Jr. via USPS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 RAUL LOPEZ, JR., CASE NO. 2:15-cv-00243-RSL 10 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, Defendant. 15 16 17 18 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant United States’ unopposed Motion to Compel Discovery Responses. The discovery requests at issue were first 19 served on January 8, 2018. Since then, the government has gone to extraordinary lengths 20 in an effort to ensure that plaintiff, both individually and through his attorneys, is aware 21 22 23 of the outstanding discovery requests. No response has been served. It is hereby ORDERED that the United States’ motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff 24 shall respond to the United States’ First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for 25 26 Production of Documents and file a certificate of service in the Court’s docket on or 27 before October 26, 2018. Failure to timely file proof of service may result in dismissal of 28 this action for failure to prosecute. Order Granting United States’ Motion to Compel Discovery Responses - 1 1 2 3 Donna Johnston recently appeared as counsel for plaintiff. A copy of this order will be served on her via the Court’s electronic docketing system. The Clerk of Court is 4 directed to mail a copy of this order to plaintiff at: 5 6 7 8 Raul Lopez, Jr. 415 Whiskey Hill Road Lopez Island, WA 98261. Dated this 2nd day of October, 2018. 9 A 10 ROBERT S. LASNIK United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order Granting United States’ Motion to Compel Discovery Responses - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?