Lopez et al v. United States Secret Service
Filing
50
ORDER granting defendant's 46 Motion to Compel Discovery Responses, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Raul Lopez, Jr. via USPS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
9 RAUL LOPEZ, JR.,
CASE NO. 2:15-cv-00243-RSL
10
11
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER GRANTING UNITED
STATES’ MOTION TO COMPEL
DISCOVERY RESPONSES
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE,
Defendant.
15
16
17
18
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant United States’ unopposed
Motion to Compel Discovery Responses. The discovery requests at issue were first
19 served on January 8, 2018. Since then, the government has gone to extraordinary lengths
20 in an effort to ensure that plaintiff, both individually and through his attorneys, is aware
21
22
23
of the outstanding discovery requests. No response has been served.
It is hereby ORDERED that the United States’ motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff
24 shall respond to the United States’ First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for
25
26
Production of Documents and file a certificate of service in the Court’s docket on or
27 before October 26, 2018. Failure to timely file proof of service may result in dismissal of
28 this action for failure to prosecute.
Order Granting United States’
Motion to Compel Discovery Responses - 1
1
2
3
Donna Johnston recently appeared as counsel for plaintiff. A copy of this order
will be served on her via the Court’s electronic docketing system. The Clerk of Court is
4 directed to mail a copy of this order to plaintiff at:
5
6
7
8
Raul Lopez, Jr.
415 Whiskey Hill Road
Lopez Island, WA 98261.
Dated this 2nd day of October, 2018.
9
A
10
ROBERT S. LASNIK
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order Granting United States’
Motion to Compel Discovery Responses - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?