Koh v. Hayes et al

Filing 45

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; granting dft John Doe's motion to dismiss by Judge Richard A Jones. (RS) cc Koh

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 JUNE KOH, Plaintiff, 9 10 11 CASE NO. C15-0418-RAJ-MAT v. DR. MAYA SARDESAI, et al., ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT JOHN DOE’S MOTION TO DISMISS Defendants. 12 13 14 The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Mary Alice Theiler, 15 United States Magistrate Judge, plaintiff’s objections thereto, and the remaining record, does 16 hereby find and Order: 17 (1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation; 18 (2) Defendant John Doe’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. 25) is GRANTED. John Doe is 19 entitled to (a) summary judgment with respect to plaintiff June Koh’s claims that (i) John Doe 20 and/or other unnamed Jail Health Services (“JHS”) staff members were deliberately indifferent 21 to a serious medical need of Mr. Koh’s, and (ii) John Doe and/or other unnamed JHS staff 22 members are liable for the deliberately indifferent medical care Mr. Koh received from Dr. Maya 23 Sardesai at Harborview Medical Center; and (b) dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT JOHN DOE’S MOTION TO DISMISS PAGE - 1 1 relief may be granted with respect to Mr. Koh’s request that the Court order the state and federal 2 governments to create a national healthcare system for prisoners; 3 4 5 6 7 (3) The only claim remaining in this lawsuit is Mr. Koh’s claim that Dr. Sardesai violated his Eighth Amendment rights under the deliberate indifference standard; and (4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties and to Judge Theiler. DATED this 2nd day of September, 2015. 8 10 A 11 The Honorable Richard A. Jones United States District Judge 9 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT JOHN DOE’S MOTION TO DISMISS PAGE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?