Koh v. Hayes et al
Filing
45
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; granting dft John Doe's motion to dismiss by Judge Richard A Jones. (RS) cc Koh
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
JUNE KOH,
Plaintiff,
9
10
11
CASE NO. C15-0418-RAJ-MAT
v.
DR. MAYA SARDESAI, et al.,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
JOHN DOE’S MOTION TO DISMISS
Defendants.
12
13
14
The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Mary Alice Theiler,
15
United States Magistrate Judge, plaintiff’s objections thereto, and the remaining record, does
16
hereby find and Order:
17
(1)
The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;
18
(2)
Defendant John Doe’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. 25) is GRANTED. John Doe is
19
entitled to (a) summary judgment with respect to plaintiff June Koh’s claims that (i) John Doe
20
and/or other unnamed Jail Health Services (“JHS”) staff members were deliberately indifferent
21
to a serious medical need of Mr. Koh’s, and (ii) John Doe and/or other unnamed JHS staff
22
members are liable for the deliberately indifferent medical care Mr. Koh received from Dr. Maya
23
Sardesai at Harborview Medical Center; and (b) dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
JOHN DOE’S MOTION TO DISMISS
PAGE - 1
1
relief may be granted with respect to Mr. Koh’s request that the Court order the state and federal
2
governments to create a national healthcare system for prisoners;
3
4
5
6
7
(3)
The only claim remaining in this lawsuit is Mr. Koh’s claim that Dr. Sardesai
violated his Eighth Amendment rights under the deliberate indifference standard; and
(4)
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties and to Judge
Theiler.
DATED this 2nd day of September, 2015.
8
10
A
11
The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Judge
9
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
JOHN DOE’S MOTION TO DISMISS
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?