Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v BSNF Railway Company
Filing
100
STIPULATION AND ORDER Regarding Briefing Schedule re parties' 98 Stipulated Motion; RENOTING Defendant's 96 MOTION to Certify and to Stay Proceedings : Noting Date 4/27/2018; Response due no later than 4/19/2018, Reply due no later than 4/27/2018. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
1
THE HONORABLE ROBERT S. LASNIK
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
11
SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBAL
COMMUNITY, a federally recognized Indian
tribe,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
v.
No. 2:15-cv-00543-RSL
STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
FOR BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY’S
MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)
AND TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware
corporation,
Defendant.
16
17
STIPULATION
18
19
BNSF Railway Company (“BNSF”) filed its Motion for Certification Pursuant to 28
20
U.S.C. § 1292(b) and to Stay Proceedings (“the Motion”) on March 29, 2018. See Dkt. No.
21
96.1 Pursuant to Local Rule 7(d)(3), plaintiff presently has until April 9, 2018 to respond to the
22
Motion, and BNSF must file its reply brief by April 13, 2018. The parties agree that there is
23
good cause to adjust the current briefing schedule and respectfully request that the Court enter
24
an order extending the briefing schedule as set forth below.
25
26
1
BNSF re-noted the Motion, see Dkt. No. 97, for April 13, 2018.
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR
CERTIFICATION - 1
No. 2:15-cv-00543-RSL
DLA Piper LLP (US)
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7000
Seattle, WA 98104-7044 | Tel: 206.839.4800
1
The parties have met and conferred, and counsel for both parties have previously
2
planned vacations over the coming weeks that fall within the Motion’s current briefing
3
schedule. The parties accordingly request the Court extend the Motion’s briefing schedule
4
slightly, which will not meaningfully delay this proceeding or cause prejudice to either party.
5
Subject to the Court’s approval, the parties agree as follows: (1) the Motion will be re-
6
noted for April 27, 2018; (2) Plaintiff will file/serve its response to the Motion no later than
7
April 19, 2018; and (3) BNSF will file/serve its reply brief no later than April 27, 2018.
8
Respectfully submitted this 3rd day of April, 2018.
9
10
TOUSLEY BRAIN STEPHENS PLLC
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
11
s/ Christopher I. Brain
Christopher I. Brain, WSBA No. 5054
s/ Chase C. Alvord
Chase C. Alvord, WSBA No. 26080
1700 Seventh Avenue, Suite 2200
Seattle, Washington 98101-1332
Tel: 206.682.5600
Fax: 206.682.2992
E-mail: cbrain@tousley.com
E-mail: calvord@tousley.com
s/ Stellman Keehnel
Stellman Keehnel, WSBA No. 9309
s/ Andrew R. Escobar
Andrew R. Escobar, WSBA No. 42793
s/ Jeffrey DeGroot
Jeffrey B. DeGroot, WSBA No. 46839
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7000
Seattle, WA 98104
Tel: 206.839.4800
Fax: 206.839.4801
E-mail: stellman.keehnel@dlapiper.com
E-mail: andrew.escobar@dlapiper.com
E-mail: jeff.degroot@dlapiper.com
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
OFFICE OF THE TRIBAL ATTORNEY,
SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBAL
COMMUNITY
s/ Stephen T. LeCuyer
Stephen T. LeCuyer, WSBA No. 36408
11404 Moorage Way
LaConner, Washington 98257
Tel: 360.466.1058
Fax: 360.466.5309
E-mail: slecuyer@swinomish.nsn.us
Attorneys for Defendant
BNSF Railway Company
23
24
25
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR
CERTIFICATION - 2
No. 2:15-cv-00543-RSL
DLA Piper LLP (US)
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7000
Seattle, WA 98104-7044 | Tel: 206.839.4800
ORDER
1
2
It is so ORDERED.
3
Dated this 4th day of April, 2018.
4
5
6
7
A
Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR
CERTIFICATION - 3
No. 2:15-cv-00543-RSL
DLA Piper LLP (US)
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7000
Seattle, WA 98104-7044 | Tel: 206.839.4800
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?