Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v BSNF Railway Company

Filing 100

STIPULATION AND ORDER Regarding Briefing Schedule re parties' 98 Stipulated Motion; RENOTING Defendant's 96 MOTION to Certify and to Stay Proceedings : Noting Date 4/27/2018; Response due no later than 4/19/2018, Reply due no later than 4/27/2018. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)

Download PDF
1 THE HONORABLE ROBERT S. LASNIK 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 11 SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBAL COMMUNITY, a federally recognized Indian tribe, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 v. No. 2:15-cv-00543-RSL STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY’S MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) AND TO STAY PROCEEDINGS BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant. 16 17 STIPULATION 18 19 BNSF Railway Company (“BNSF”) filed its Motion for Certification Pursuant to 28 20 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and to Stay Proceedings (“the Motion”) on March 29, 2018. See Dkt. No. 21 96.1 Pursuant to Local Rule 7(d)(3), plaintiff presently has until April 9, 2018 to respond to the 22 Motion, and BNSF must file its reply brief by April 13, 2018. The parties agree that there is 23 good cause to adjust the current briefing schedule and respectfully request that the Court enter 24 an order extending the briefing schedule as set forth below. 25 26 1 BNSF re-noted the Motion, see Dkt. No. 97, for April 13, 2018. STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION - 1 No. 2:15-cv-00543-RSL DLA Piper LLP (US) 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7000 Seattle, WA 98104-7044 | Tel: 206.839.4800 1 The parties have met and conferred, and counsel for both parties have previously 2 planned vacations over the coming weeks that fall within the Motion’s current briefing 3 schedule. The parties accordingly request the Court extend the Motion’s briefing schedule 4 slightly, which will not meaningfully delay this proceeding or cause prejudice to either party. 5 Subject to the Court’s approval, the parties agree as follows: (1) the Motion will be re- 6 noted for April 27, 2018; (2) Plaintiff will file/serve its response to the Motion no later than 7 April 19, 2018; and (3) BNSF will file/serve its reply brief no later than April 27, 2018. 8 Respectfully submitted this 3rd day of April, 2018. 9 10 TOUSLEY BRAIN STEPHENS PLLC DLA PIPER LLP (US) 11 s/ Christopher I. Brain Christopher I. Brain, WSBA No. 5054 s/ Chase C. Alvord Chase C. Alvord, WSBA No. 26080 1700 Seventh Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, Washington 98101-1332 Tel: 206.682.5600 Fax: 206.682.2992 E-mail: cbrain@tousley.com E-mail: calvord@tousley.com s/ Stellman Keehnel Stellman Keehnel, WSBA No. 9309 s/ Andrew R. Escobar Andrew R. Escobar, WSBA No. 42793 s/ Jeffrey DeGroot Jeffrey B. DeGroot, WSBA No. 46839 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7000 Seattle, WA 98104 Tel: 206.839.4800 Fax: 206.839.4801 E-mail: stellman.keehnel@dlapiper.com E-mail: andrew.escobar@dlapiper.com E-mail: jeff.degroot@dlapiper.com 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 OFFICE OF THE TRIBAL ATTORNEY, SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBAL COMMUNITY s/ Stephen T. LeCuyer Stephen T. LeCuyer, WSBA No. 36408 11404 Moorage Way LaConner, Washington 98257 Tel: 360.466.1058 Fax: 360.466.5309 E-mail: slecuyer@swinomish.nsn.us Attorneys for Defendant BNSF Railway Company 23 24 25 26 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION - 2 No. 2:15-cv-00543-RSL DLA Piper LLP (US) 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7000 Seattle, WA 98104-7044 | Tel: 206.839.4800 ORDER 1 2 It is so ORDERED. 3 Dated this 4th day of April, 2018. 4 5 6   7 A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge  8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION - 3 No. 2:15-cv-00543-RSL DLA Piper LLP (US) 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7000 Seattle, WA 98104-7044 | Tel: 206.839.4800

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?