Kater v. Churchill Downs Incorporated

Filing 244

ORDER re Third-Party Movant's 228 Motion to Cease and Desist; 229 Motion to Quash. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH) (cc: Movant Fleming via US mail)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-00612-RSL Document 244 Filed 10/14/20 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 9 CHERYL KATER and SUZIE KELLY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 10 ORDER v. 11 12 Cause No. C15-0612RSL CHURCHILL DOWNS INCORPORATED and BIG FISH GAMES, INC., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 This matter comes before the Court on third-party Jeffrey E. Fleming’s motion to quash a subpoena seeking information regarding his Google account (Dkt. # 229) and motion for an order directing plaintiffs and their attorneys to cease all efforts to contact him regarding the above-captioned lawsuit (Dkt. # 228). In response to Mr. Fleming’s motions, plaintiffs have 21 taken steps to ensure that his information will not be included in Google’s production in 22 response to the subpoena and will make best reasonable efforts to ensure that he is not included 23 in the class lists used by the Claims Administrator. Plaintiffs oppose entry of a cease and desist 24 25 26 order as unnecessary, however, and argue that quashing the subpoena served on Google will upend the class action settlement procedures. 27 28 ORDER - 1 Case 2:15-cv-00612-RSL Document 244 Filed 10/14/20 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 Having reviewed the submissions of Mr. Fleming and plaintiffs, the Court interprets Mr. Fleming’s objections to the production of his Google account information as an indication that he does not want to be part of the settlement class in the above-captioned matter. The Court 4 5 6 7 therefore finds that he has opted out of the settlement process and will not participate in any allocation of the settlement funds. With regards to the specific relief requested by Mr. Fleming, the Court is satisfied that his 8 information was not (or will not be) included in Google’s data production. If, however, his 9 information has been produced to plaintiffs, they shall delete the information from their files, 10 11 12 13 refrain from making any attempt to contact him regarding this litigation in the future, and ensure that the Claims Administrator does not contact him. Dated this 14th day of October, 2020. 14 15 Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?