Nguyen v. The Boeing Company

Filing 124

MINUTE ORDER re Plaintiff's 122 Objections to Defendant's submitted deposition designations. The Court rules as follows: Plaintiff's objections to Deposition excerpts 16:2-16:15, 19:3-4, 32:21-33:11, and 34:5-20 are sustained, and P laintiff's objections to Deposition excerpts 16:16-18:18, 18:24-19:2, and 19:5-12 are overruled. The Court further rules that Deposition excerpt 18:19-23 is only admitted for the limited purpose of providing context as to why the witness acted as he did and his thought process concerning the relevant disciplinary action. Signed by Judge Richard A Jones. (TH)

HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

5
6

MINHNGA NGUYEN,

7

Plaintiff,

8
9

v.

Case No. C15-00793-RAJ
ORDER

THE BOEING COMPANY,

10

Defendant.

11
12

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s objections to Defendant’s

13

submitted deposition designations. Dkt. # 122. On April 27, 2017, the parties submitted

14

Plaintiff’s objections to deposition designations of Keith Sellers’ deposition transcript

15

(“Deposition”) and Defendant’s responses. Having reviewed the submissions of the

16

parties, the relevant portions of the transcript, and the applicable law, the Court rules as

17

follows: Plaintiff’s objections to Deposition excerpts 16:2-16:15, 19:3-4, 32:21-33:11,

18

and 34:5-20 are sustained, and Plaintiff’s objections to Deposition excerpts 16:16-18:18,

19

18:24-19:2, and 19:5-12 are overruled. The Court further rules that Deposition excerpt

20

18:19-23 is only admitted for the limited purpose of providing context as to why the

21

witness acted as he did and his thought process concerning the relevant disciplinary

22

action.

23

DATED this 1st day of May, 2018.

24

A

25
26

The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Judge

27
28

ORDER – 1