Fields v. Ingram et al
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Judge Thomas S. Zilly re 17 Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's 12 Motion to dismiss respondents' return and his petition for writ of habeas corpus are DENIED. Case is DISMISSED with prejudice. (PM)cc: petitioner, MAT
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
4
5
6
VINCENT L. FIELDS,
Petitioner,
7
8
9
C15-799 TSZ
v.
ORDER
CHARLES INGRAM, et al.,
Respondents.
10
11
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation
12 (“R&R”) of the Honorable Mary Alice Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge, docket
13 no. 17. A copy of the R&R was mailed to petitioner pro se at Tacoma Residential
14 Reentry Center (“TRRC”), but was returned to the Court as undeliverable because the
15 TRRC had relocated. Another copy of the R&R was mailed to petitioner pro se at
16 TRRC’s new address on Milwaukee Way in Tacoma, Washington, and it has not been
17 returned. The Court is satisfied that petitioner pro se received the R&R, as well as a copy
18 of the Minute Order entered October 6, 2015, docket no. 19, which set a deadline of
19 November 10, 2015, for him to file any objection to the R&R. No objection has been
20 timely filed.
21
The R&R recommends denying petitioner’s motion to dismiss respondents’ return,
22 docket no. 12, and his petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, docket
23
ORDER - 1
1 no. 1. The R&R, docket no. 17, is hereby ADOPTED, petitioner’s motion to dismiss
2 respondents’ return and his petition for writ of habeas corpus are DENIED, and this case
3 is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment consistent
4 with this Order, to send a copy of this Order to all counsel of record, petitioner pro se,
5 and Magistrate Judge Theiler, and to CLOSE this case.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated this 1st day of December, 2015.
8
A
9
10
Thomas S. Zilly
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?