Parker v. Berryhill

Filing 16

ORDER OF REMAND by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. This Court hereby ORDERS that pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this matter is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings in a manner consistent with the parties' settlement agreement. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 9 MICHELE LYNETTE PARKER, Case No. C15-0805RSM Plaintiff, ORDER OF REMAND 10 v. 11 12 13 14 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 15 Plaintiff, Michele Lynette Parker, initially brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 16 17 405(g), and 1383(c)(3), seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of 18 Social Security denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental 19 Security Income disability benefits, under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act. 20 Dkt. #3. This Court affirmed the Commissioner’s decision on December 1, 2015. Dkt. #10. 21 Plaintiff then appealed that decision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Dkt. #12. On April 22 23 24, 2017, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued the following Order: 26 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation in the settlement agreement (Docket Entry No. 15), the appeal is remanded to the district court. Pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the district court shall remand this case for further administrative proceedings. 27 REMANDED. 24 25 28 Dkt. #15 (bold in original). The appeal has since been closed. ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY, PAGE - 1 1 Accordingly, this Court hereby ORDERS that pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 2 405(g), this matter is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings in a manner 3 consistent with the parties’ settlement agreement. 4 DATED this 1st day of May 2017. 5 6 7 8 9 A RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY, PAGE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?