Bunger v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America

Filing 59

JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiff Chris Bunger against Defendant Unum Life Insurance Company of America, by Judge Richard A. Jones. (VE)

Download PDF
1 HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 CHRIS BUNGER, No. 2:15-cv-01050-RAJ 10 Plaintiff 11 JUDGMENT v. 12 13 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 This action came to consideration before the Court. The issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant as 18 19 20 21 follows: 1) Defendant’s Second Motion for Judgment (Dkt. 53) is DENIED. 2) Plaintiff’s Second Motion for Judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52 22 (Dkt. 47) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Mr. Bunger establishes his disability under 23 Unum’s short-term disability plan from August 30, 2014 to October 4, 2014, and under the long- 24 term disability plan from October 5, 2014 to July 5, 2015. Unum shall pay Mr. Bunger short- 25 term disability benefits for the period from August 30, 2014 through October 4, 2014 in the 26 27 amount of $2,715.43; long-term disability benefits for the period from October 5, 2014 through JUDGMENT - 1 No. 2:15-cv-01050-RAJ LAW OFFICE OF MEL CRAWFORD 9425 35th Ave NE Suite C Seattle, Washington 98115 Tel 206.694-1614 Fax 206.905-2342 1 July 5, 2015 in the amount of $20,592.00; and interest on those benefits in the amount of 2 $3,562.15. 3 3) The Court REMANDS to Unum the issue of Mr. Bunger’s entitlement to LTD benefits 4 from July 6, 2015 and beyond. 5 6 DATED this 5th day of April, 2018. A 7 8 The Honorable Richard A. Jones United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 JUDGMENT - 2 No. 2:15-cv-01050-RAJ LAW OFFICE OF MEL CRAWFORD 9425 35th Ave NE Suite C Seattle, Washington 98115 Tel 206.694-1614 Fax 206.905-2342

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?