Griffin v. Society of Professional Engineering Employees in Aerospace

Filing 23

ORDER denying plaintiff's 22 Motion for Reconsideration by Judge Richard A Jones.(RS)

1

HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES

2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

8
9
10

ELLEN C GRIFFIN,

11

Plaintiff,

12

14
15

ORDER

v.

13

CASE NO. C15-1088 RAJ

SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEERING EMPLOYEES IN
AEROSPACE,

16

Defendant.

17
18

The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Dkt. # 22).

19 Pursuant to Local Rules W.D. Wash. CR 7(h)(1), motions for reconsideration are
20 disfavored, and will ordinarily be denied unless there is a showing of (a) manifest error in
21 the prior ruling, or (b) facts or legal authority which could not have been brought to the
22 attention of the court earlier, through reasonable diligence. The sole basis for
23 reconsideration is Plaintiff’s repeated and conclusory argument that she has presented
24 sufficient evidence to prove her claims. The Court has already ruled on this argument,
25 and Plaintiff fails to present a single new legal argument or piece of new evidence that
26
27

ORDER- 1

1 she could not have offered prior to this motion. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is
2 therefore DENIED. Dkt. # 22.
3
4

Dated this 24th day of February, 2017.

5
6

A

7
8

The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

ORDER- 2