Money Mailer, LLC v. Wade Brewer

Filing 295

SECOND ORDER FOR FURTHER BRIEFING: The Clerk of Court is directed to renote Brewer's motion for adequate security (Dkt. # 267 ) on the Court's calendar for Friday, 7/3/2020. Within five days of the date of this Order, Money Mailer shall provide additional briefing (not to exceed six pages) and evidence regarding (a) its right to pursue this litigation in light of the alleged sale of all of its assets, (b) its assets, liabilities, and income following the transfer to the Assignee, (c) its projections or forecasts regarding income it anticipates receiving through any reversionary provision in the assignment agreements, related contracts, or governing statutes, and (d) the costs of obtaining a bond in the amount of $640,000. Brewer may file a response of no more than six pages within seven days of Money Mailer's filing. Money Mailer may file a reply of no more than three pages on or before the note date. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (MW)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

6
7
8

MONEY MAILER, LLC,
Plaintiff,

9
10
11
12

v.
WADE G. BREWER,

NO. C15-1215RSL
SECOND ORDER FOR FURTHER
BRIEFING

Defendant.

13
14
15

This matter comes before the Court on “Wade Brewer’s Motion for Adequate Security.”

16

Dkt. # 267. On June 3, 2020, the Court directed Money Mailer to address the third factor of the

17

Simulnet E. Assocs. v. Ramada Hotel Operating Co., 37 F.3d 573, 576 (9th Cir. 1994), analysis,

18

namely whether it has the financial wherewithal to post a bond of $640,000. Money Mailer’s

19
20
21
22

response is so general that it provides virtually no information regarding the structure of the
assignment agreements, the short- and long-term impacts of the agreements on its finances, or
the costs of obtaining a bond. Having reviewed the evidence submitted by defendant, it is

23

entirely possible that, although Money Mailer is currently shorn of its assets, any funds and

24

assets left after the Assignee administers the claims process for unsecured creditors will revert

25

back to Money Mailer. In addition, if, as Money Mailer contends, all of its assets have been

26

transferred to the Assignee (with or without a reversionary interest), it may no longer have

27
28

SECOND ORDER FOR FURTHER BRIEFING - 1

1
2
3

standing to pursue this litigation.
The Clerk of Court is directed to renote Brewer’s motion for adequate security (Dkt.
# 267) on the Court’s calendar for Friday, July 3, 2020. Within five days of the date of this

4
5

Order, Money Mailer shall provide additional briefing (not to exceed six pages) and evidence

6

regarding (a) its right to pursue this litigation in light of the alleged sale of all of its assets, (b) its

7

assets, liabilities, and income following the transfer to the Assignee, (c) its projections or

8

forecasts regarding income it anticipates receiving through any reversionary provision in the

9
10
11
12
13

assignment agreements, related contracts, or governing statutes, and (d) the costs of obtaining a
bond in the amount of $640,000. Brewer may file a response of no more than six pages within
seven days of Money Mailer’s filing. Money Mailer may file a reply of no more than three pages
on or before the note date.

14
15
16
17

Dated this 18th day of June, 2020.

A

Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

SECOND ORDER FOR FURTHER BRIEFING - 2