Puget Soundkeeper Alliance et al v. McCarthy et al

Filing 32

ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 27 Motion to Reopen Case; granting Plaintiffs' 28 Motion to amend and supplement the complaint; staying Plaintiffs' claims challenging the 2015 Waters of the United States Rule pending the Court's resolution of Plaintiffs' proposed additional claims. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (PM)

Download PDF
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 10 11 PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE and SIERRA CLUB, CASE NO. C15-1342-JCC ORDER Plaintiffs, v. 12 13 14 15 SCOTT PRUITT, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, and R.D. JAMES, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, Defendants. 16 17 18 This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ stipulated motion to reopen the case 19 and stay claims (Dkt. No. 31). The parties agree that the Court should reopen the case, permit 20 Plaintiffs to amend and supplement the complaint, and stay existing claims. (Id. at 1.) Having 21 considered the parties’ stipulation and Plaintiffs’ unopposed motions to reopen the case (Dkt. 22 No. 27) and for leave to amend the complaint (Dkt. No. 28), the Court finds good cause to 23 ENTER the parties’ stipulated order (Dkt. No. 31). Therefore, the Court ORDERS as follows: 24 25 26 (1) Plaintiffs’ motion to reopen the case (Dkt. No. 27) is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to reopen this matter. (2) Plaintiffs’ motion to amend and supplement the complaint (Dkt. No. 28) is ORDER C15-1342-JCC PAGE - 1 1 2 3 4 GRANTED. (3) Plaintiffs’ existing claims challenging the 2015 Waters of the United States Rule are STAYED pending the Court’s resolution of Plaintiffs’ proposed additional claims. DATED this 27th day of April 2018. 5 A 6 7 8 John C. Coughenour UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER C15-1342-JCC PAGE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?