Spokane Riverkeeper v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Filing 21

ORDER granting 20 Motion for Extension of Time to 11/22/17 to Answer signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE SPOKANE RIVERKEEPER, 7 Plaintiff, 8 9 10 v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, 11 12 Defendant. ) ) ) No. 2:15-cv-01542-RSM ) ) ) ) ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR ) EXTENSION OF TIME ) ) ) 13 14 15 The Court, having considered the Joint Motion for Extension of Time (“Motion”), and for good cause shown, hereby GRANTS the Motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 16 17 18 Defendant’s answer or other response to Plaintiff’s Complaint is due November 22, 2017. Dated this 21st day of July, 2017. 19 20 A 21 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 Order Granting Joint Motion For Extension; Re Answer No. 2:15-cv-01542-RSM U.S. Dept. of Justice/ENRD P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044 1 1 2 Presented By: 3 4 5 6 7 8 /s/ David J. Kaplan David J. Kaplan U.S. Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Environmental Defense Section P.O. Box 7611 Washington, DC 20044 (202) 514-2741 Email: sonya.shea@usdoj.gov 9 10 Attorney for Defendant Environmental Protection Agency 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order Granting Joint Motion For Extension; Re Answer No. 2:15-cv-01542-RSM U.S. Dept. of Justice/ENRD P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044 (202) 514-0997 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?