Microsoft Corporation v. Internal Revenue Service

Filing 37

ORDER granting the parties' 36 Second Consent Motion Regarding Case Schedule. The IRS to provide draft revised Vaughn indices by 9/17/2021. The IRS to file its motion for summary judgment by 10/29/2021. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-01605-RSM Document 37 Filed 08/13/21 Page 1 of 5 HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 MICROSOFT CORPORATION, NO. 2:15-cv-01605 RSM 11 12 13 Plaintiff, vs. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SECOND CONSENT MOTION AND ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE The above-captioned action is for declaratory and injunctive relief under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, as amended, and the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. The parties jointly request that the action remain open and that the Court approve the parties’ agreed upon, modified schedule set forth in paragraph 1, below. In support of this request, the parties state the following: 1. On June 16, 2021, the Court issued a case management order in which the Court adopted the parties’ proposed schedule and case management order. Under that schedule, the IRS was required to provide Microsoft with draft revised declarations by June 24, 2021 and draft revised Vaughn indices by August 13, 2021, and to file a motion for summary judgment by SECOND CONSENT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE (Case Nos. 2:15-cv-1605) U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division Ben Franklin Station , P.O. Box 227 Washington, D.C. 20044 202-616-8994 (Phone) 202-524-6866 (Fax) Case 2:15-cv-01605-RSM Document 37 Filed 08/13/21 Page 2 of 5 1 September 13, 2021. The IRS provided draft revised declarations to Microsoft on June 24, 2021, 2 and Microsoft responded by letter dated July 28, 2021. The IRS, however, needs additional time 3 to complete drafting revised Vaughn indices.1 The IRS accordingly requests, and Microsoft 4 consents, to extend the remaining deadlines for transmitting draft revised Vaughn indices to 5 Microsoft and for filing a motion for summary judgment. The IRS therefore requests that the 6 Court adopt the following revised schedule for the above-captioned case: 7 SCHEDULE 8 Event 9 The IRS to provide draft revised Vaughn indices: 10 The IRS to file its motion for summary judgment: 11 12 13 14 15 2. September 17, 2021 October 29, 2021 Recognizing that the parties continue to engage in good faith negotiations, the parties agree that evidence of the IRS’s efforts to address Microsoft’s concerns, including any revisions to previously exchanged declarations or exemption claims, is not admissible to prove that the IRS’s search was unreasonable or that the IRS’s exemption claims were improper. 16 17 Date 3. The parties jointly request that this action remain open and that the Court enter an order adopting the case schedule proposed in paragraph 1. 18 Respectfully submitted this 12th day of August, 2021. 19 20 21 // 22 // 23 24 25 // 1 The IRS has also proposed, and Microsoft has consented to, a two-week extension (by August 27, 2021) to provide Microsoft with draft revised Vaughn indices in 2:15-cv-00369 and 2:15-cv-00850. SECOND CONSENT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE (Case Nos. 2:15-cv-1605) U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division Ben Franklin Station , P.O. Box 227 Washington, D.C. 20044 202-616-8994 (Phone) 202-524-6866 (Fax) Case 2:15-cv-01605-RSM Document 37 Filed 08/13/21 Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BAKER & McKENZIE LLP By: s/ Daniel A. Rosen Daniel A. Rosen, NYBA #2790442 Pro Hac Vice 452 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10018 Tel: (212) 626-4272 Fax: (212) 310-1600 Email: daniel.rosen@bakermckenzie.com Attorney for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE By: s/ Stephen S. Ho Stephen S. Ho Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice Post Office Box 227 Washington, DC 20044 Tel: (202) 616-8994 Fax: (202) 514-6866 Email: stephen.s.ho@usdoj.gov Attorney for Defendant Internal Revenue Service 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SECOND CONSENT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE (Case Nos. 2:15-cv-1605) U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division Ben Franklin Station , P.O. Box 227 Washington, D.C. 20044 202-616-8994 (Phone) 202-524-6866 (Fax) Case 2:15-cv-01605-RSM Document 37 Filed 08/13/21 Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing JOINT MOTION via the Court’s electronic case filing system on August 12, 2021. 4 5 6 /s Stephen S. Ho STEPHEN S. HO 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SECOND CONSENT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE (Case Nos. 2:15-cv-1605) U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division Ben Franklin Station , P.O. Box 227 Washington, D.C. 20044 202-616-8994 (Phone) 202-524-6866 (Fax) Case 2:15-cv-01605-RSM Document 37 Filed 08/13/21 Page 5 of 5 1 ORDER 2 It is SO ORDERED this 13th day of August, 2021. 3 4 A 5 6 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 Presented by: 9 10 BAKER & McKENZIE LLP 11 By: s/ Daniel A. Rosen Daniel A. Rosen, NYBA #2790442 Pro Hac Vice 452 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10018 Tel: (212) 626-4272 Fax: (212) 310-1600 Email: daniel.rosen@bakermckenzie.com 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Attorney for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE By: s/ Stephen S. Ho Stephen S. Ho Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice Post Office Box 227 Washington, DC 20044 Tel: (202) 616-8994 Fax: (202) 514-6866 Email: stephen.s.ho@usdoj.gov Attorney for Defendant Internal Revenue Service SECOND CONSENT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE (Case Nos. 2:15-cv-1605) U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division Ben Franklin Station , P.O. Box 227 Washington, D.C. 20044 202-616-8994 (Phone) 202-524-6866 (Fax)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?