Microsoft Corporation v. Internal Revenue Service

Filing 41

ORDER granting Parties' 40 Third Consent Motion Regarding Case Schedule. The IRS to provide draft revised Vaughn indices by 10/15/2021. The IRS to file its motion for summary judgment by 12/3/2021. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-01605-RSM Document 41 Filed 09/17/21 Page 1 of 5 HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 MICROSOFT CORPORATION, NO. 2:15-cv-01605 RSM 11 12 13 Plaintiff, vs. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 THIRD CONSENT MOTION AND ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE The above-captioned action is for declaratory and injunctive relief under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, as amended, and the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. The parties jointly request that the action remain open and that the Court approve the parties’ agreed upon, modified schedule set forth in paragraph 1, below. In support of this request, the parties state the following: 1. On August 13, 2021, the Court issued a modified case management order in which the Court adopted the parties’ proposed revised schedule and case management order. Under that schedule, the IRS was required to provide Microsoft with a draft revised Vaughn index by September 17, 2021, and to file a motion for summary judgment by October 29, 2021. THIRD CONSENT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE (Case Nos. 2:15-cv-1605) U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division Ben Franklin Station , P.O. Box 227 Washington, D.C. 20044 202-616-8994 (Phone) 202-524-6866 (Fax) Case 2:15-cv-01605-RSM Document 41 Filed 09/17/21 Page 2 of 5 1 The IRS, however, underestimated the amount of time and resources needed to complete a draft 2 revised Vaughn index in this matter. The parties also plan to thereafter engage in good faith 3 negotiations to attempt to narrow the issues that might need to be resolved through summary 4 judgment proceedings.1 The IRS accordingly requests, and Microsoft consents, to extend the 5 remaining deadlines for transmitting a draft revised Vaughn index to Microsoft and for filing a 6 motion for summary judgment. The IRS therefore requests that the Court adopt the following 7 revised schedule for the above-captioned case: 8 SCHEDULE 9 10 The IRS to provide draft revised Vaughn indices: 12 13 15 16 2. December 3, 2021 Recognizing that the parties continue to engage in good faith negotiations, the parties agree that evidence of the IRS’s efforts to address Microsoft’s concerns, including any revisions to previously exchanged declarations or exemption claims, is not admissible to prove that the IRS’s search was unreasonable or that the IRS’s exemption claims were improper. 17 18 October 15, 2021 The IRS to file its motion for summary judgment: 11 14 Date Event 3. The parties jointly request that this action remain open and that the Court enter an order adopting the case schedule proposed in paragraph 1. 19 Respectfully submitted this 17th day of September, 2021. 20 // 21 // 22 // 23 24 25 1 The IRS provided Microsoft with a draft revised Vaughn index in 2:15-cv-00369 and 2:15-cv-00850 on August 27, 2021, and the parties are in the process of identifying and attempting to address issues in the index. THIRD CONSENT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE (Case Nos. 2:15-cv-1605) U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division Ben Franklin Station , P.O. Box 227 Washington, D.C. 20044 202-616-8994 (Phone) 202-524-6866 (Fax) Case 2:15-cv-01605-RSM Document 41 Filed 09/17/21 Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BAKER & McKENZIE LLP By: s/ Daniel A. Rosen Daniel A. Rosen, NYBA #2790442 Pro Hac Vice 452 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10018 Tel: (212) 626-4272 Fax: (212) 310-1600 Email: daniel.rosen@bakermckenzie.com Attorney for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE By: s/ Stephen S. Ho Stephen S. Ho Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice Post Office Box 227 Washington, DC 20044 Tel: (202) 616-8994 Fax: (202) 514-6866 Email: stephen.s.ho@usdoj.gov Attorney for Defendant Internal Revenue Service 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 THIRD CONSENT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE (Case Nos. 2:15-cv-1605) U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division Ben Franklin Station , P.O. Box 227 Washington, D.C. 20044 202-616-8994 (Phone) 202-524-6866 (Fax) Case 2:15-cv-01605-RSM Document 41 Filed 09/17/21 Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing JOINT MOTION via the Court’s electronic case filing system on September 17, 2021. 4 5 6 /s Stephen S. Ho STEPHEN S. HO 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 THIRD CONSENT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE (Case Nos. 2:15-cv-1605) U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division Ben Franklin Station , P.O. Box 227 Washington, D.C. 20044 202-616-8994 (Phone) 202-524-6866 (Fax) Case 2:15-cv-01605-RSM Document 41 Filed 09/17/21 Page 5 of 5 1 ORDER 2 It is SO ORDERED this 17th day of September, 2021. 3 A 4 5 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 Presented by: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 BAKER & McKENZIE LLP By: s/ Daniel A. Rosen Daniel A. Rosen, NYBA #2790442 Pro Hac Vice 452 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10018 Tel: (212) 626-4272 Fax: (212) 310-1600 Email: daniel.rosen@bakermckenzie.com Attorney for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation 17 18 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 19 By: 20 21 22 23 24 s/ Stephen S. Ho Stephen S. Ho Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice Post Office Box 227 Washington, DC 20044 Tel: (202) 616-8994 Fax: (202) 514-6866 Email: stephen.s.ho@usdoj.gov Attorney for Defendant Internal Revenue Service 25 THIRD CONSENT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE (Case Nos. 2:15-cv-1605) U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division Ben Franklin Station , P.O. Box 227 Washington, D.C. 20044 202-616-8994 (Phone) 202-524-6866 (Fax)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?