Microsoft Corporation v. Internal Revenue Service

Filing 43

ORDER re Defendant's 42 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. The deadline for filing a motion for summary judgment is extended up to and including 1/28/2022. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)

Download PDF
HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 MICROSOFT CORPORATION, NO. 2:15-cv-01605 RSM 11 12 13 Plaintiff, vs. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 FOURTH CONSENT MOTION AND ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE The above-captioned action is for declaratory and injunctive relief under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, as amended, and the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. The parties jointly request that the action remain open and that the Court approve the parties’ agreed upon, modified schedule set forth in paragraph 3, below. In support of this request, the parties state the following: 1. On September 17, 2021, the Court issued a modified case management order adopting the parties’ proposed revised schedule and case management order. Under that schedule, the IRS was required to file a motion for summary judgment by December 3, 2021. 25 FOURTH CONSENT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE (Case Nos. 2:15-cv-1605) U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division Ben Franklin Station , P.O. Box 227 Washington, D.C. 20044 202-616-8994 (Phone) 202-524-6866 (Fax) 1 2. Counsel for the IRS and Microsoft have had regular discussions over the past 2 months to identify and attempt to narrow the issues for which summary judgment briefing would 3 be necessary. By letters dated September 22, 2021 and November 10, 2021, Microsoft 4 acknowledged that the IRS had addressed some of its concerns, and summarized a variety of 5 outstanding issues it had raised previously regarding the IRS’s productions, draft declarations, 6 and draft Vaughn indices, including certain exemption claims. The IRS responded to certain of 7 the issues raised by Microsoft by letter dated November 23, 2021, and in the process, discovered 8 that its previously provided draft Vaughn index was incomplete and missing approximately 9 3,400 records. The IRS therefore needs additional time to supplement and revise its previously 10 provided draft Vaughn index. The IRS is also in the process of responding to Microsoft’s 11 remaining concerns, and the parties are still engaging in good faith negotiations to narrow the 12 issues that may be addressed in summary judgment proceedings. 13 3. The IRS accordingly requests, and Microsoft consents, to extend the remaining 14 deadline for the filing of the IRS’s motion for summary judgment. The IRS thus requests that the 15 Court adopt a case schedule extending the deadline for filing a motion for summary judgment up 16 to and including January 28, 2022 for the above-captioned case. 17 4. Recognizing that the parties continue to engage in good faith negotiations, the 18 parties agree that evidence of the IRS’s efforts to address Microsoft’s concerns, including any 19 revisions to previously exchanged declarations or exemption claims, is not admissible to prove 20 that the IRS’s search was unreasonable or that the IRS’s exemption claims were improper. 21 5. The parties jointly request that this action remain open and that the Court enter an 22 order adopting the case schedule proposed in paragraph 3. 23 // 24 // 25 // FOURTH CONSENT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE (Case Nos. 2:15-cv-1605) U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division Ben Franklin Station , P.O. Box 227 Washington, D.C. 20044 202-616-8994 (Phone) 202-524-6866 (Fax) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Respectfully submitted this 2nd day of December, 2021. BAKER & McKENZIE LLP By: s/ Daniel A. Rosen Daniel A. Rosen, NYBA #2790442 Pro Hac Vice 452 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10018 Tel: (212) 626-4272 Fax: (212) 310-1600 Email: daniel.rosen@bakermckenzie.com 8 9 Attorney for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation 10 11 12 13 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 14 By: 15 16 17 18 19 20 s/ Stephen S. Ho Stephen S. Ho Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice Post Office Box 227 Washington, DC 20044 Tel: (202) 616-8994 Fax: (202) 514-6866 Email: stephen.s.ho@usdoj.gov Attorney for Defendant Internal Revenue Service 21 22 23 24 25 FOURTH CONSENT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE (Case Nos. 2:15-cv-1605) U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division Ben Franklin Station , P.O. Box 227 Washington, D.C. 20044 202-616-8994 (Phone) 202-524-6866 (Fax) 1 2 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing JOINT MOTION via the Court’s electronic case filing system on December 2, 2021. 4 5 6 /s Stephen S. Ho STEPHEN S. HO 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 FOURTH CONSENT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE (Case Nos. 2:15-cv-1605) U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division Ben Franklin Station , P.O. Box 227 Washington, D.C. 20044 202-616-8994 (Phone) 202-524-6866 (Fax) 1 ORDER 2 It is SO ORDERED this 6th day of December, 2021. 3 4 A 5 6 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Presented by: BAKER & McKENZIE LLP By: s/ Daniel A. Rosen Daniel A. Rosen, NYBA #2790442 Pro Hac Vice 452 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10018 Tel: (212) 626-4272 Fax: (212) 310-1600 Email: daniel.rosen@bakermckenzie.com 16 17 Attorney for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE By: s/ Stephen S. Ho Stephen S. Ho Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice Post Office Box 227 Washington, DC 20044 Tel: (202) 616-8994 Fax: (202) 514-6866 Email: stephen.s.ho@usdoj.gov Attorney for Defendant Internal Revenue Service FOURTH CONSENT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE (Case Nos. 2:15-cv-1605) U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division Ben Franklin Station , P.O. Box 227 Washington, D.C. 20044 202-616-8994 (Phone) 202-524-6866 (Fax)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?