Owusu et al v. Bank of America NA et al

Filing 76

ORDER re-noting plaintiff's 66 motion for partial summary judgment for 4/28/2017, the same day defendants' motion is noted; denying as moot plaintiff's motions for extension of time 71 , 72 ; denying plaintiff's 69 motion fo r order directing Clerk to photocopy exhibits in color; directing defendants' to correct within 7 days any filing errors or provide a brief explanation to the Court as to why two motions 74 , 75 were filed. Signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Derick Owusu, Prisoner ID: 383543)(PM)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

7
8
9
10
11

Case No. C15-1606-JLR-JPD

DERICK OWUSU,
Plaintiff,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, et al.,

12

Defendants.

ORDER RE-NOTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT,
DENYING MOTION FOR COLOR
PHOTOCOPIES, AND DIRECTING
DEFENDANTS TO PROVIDE
CLARIFICATION

13
14

This is a pro se prisoner civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s motion for

15

partial summary judgment is noted for March 10, 2017, and defendants’ motion for summary

16

judgment is noted for April 28, 2017. It appears defendants filed their motion twice. Dkts. 74 &

17

75. In addition, plaintiff has filed a motion for an order directing the Clerk to provide color

18

photocopies of exhibits, Dkt. 69, and two motions for an extension of time to file his reply in

19

support of his motion for partial summary judgment, Dkts. 71 & 72. Having considered the

20

parties’ submissions, the Court finds and ORDERS:

21

(1)

In the interests of judicial efficiency, the Clerk is directed to RE-NOTE plaintiff’s

22

motion for partial summary judgment, Dkt. 66, for April 28, 2017, the same day defendants’

23

motion is noted.
ORDER - 1

(2)

1

In accordance with the local rules, Plaintiff may file a reply brief in support of his

2

motion for partial summary judgment on or before the noting date, which is now April 28, 2017.

3

Thus, plaintiff’s motions for extension of time, Dkts. 71 & 72, are DENIED as moot.
(3)

4

Plaintiff’s motion for an order directing the Clerk to photocopy exhibits in color,

5

Dkt. 69, is DENIED. Documents that are e-filed with the Court, including the exhibits

6

accompanying plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment, are scanned in their original

7

color. Accordingly, plaintiff does not need to submit hard copies of the exhibits that are in color.
(4)

8
9
10

74 & 75. Within seven days of the date of this order, defendants shall correct any filing error or
provide a brief explanation to the Court as to why two motions were filed.
(5)

11
12
13

It appears that defendants filed their summary judgment motion twice. See Dkts.

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this order to the parties and to Judge

Robart.
Dated this 3rd day of April, 2017.

A

14

JAMES P. DONOHUE
Chief United States Magistrate Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER - 2