Owusu et al v. Bank of America NA et al

Filing 76

ORDER re-noting plaintiff's 66 motion for partial summary judgment for 4/28/2017, the same day defendants' motion is noted; denying as moot plaintiff's motions for extension of time 71 , 72 ; denying plaintiff's 69 motion fo r order directing Clerk to photocopy exhibits in color; directing defendants' to correct within 7 days any filing errors or provide a brief explanation to the Court as to why two motions 74 , 75 were filed. Signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Derick Owusu, Prisoner ID: 383543)(PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 10 11 Case No. C15-1606-JLR-JPD DERICK OWUSU, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, et al., 12 Defendants. ORDER RE-NOTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING MOTION FOR COLOR PHOTOCOPIES, AND DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO PROVIDE CLARIFICATION 13 14 This is a pro se prisoner civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s motion for 15 partial summary judgment is noted for March 10, 2017, and defendants’ motion for summary 16 judgment is noted for April 28, 2017. It appears defendants filed their motion twice. Dkts. 74 & 17 75. In addition, plaintiff has filed a motion for an order directing the Clerk to provide color 18 photocopies of exhibits, Dkt. 69, and two motions for an extension of time to file his reply in 19 support of his motion for partial summary judgment, Dkts. 71 & 72. Having considered the 20 parties’ submissions, the Court finds and ORDERS: 21 (1) In the interests of judicial efficiency, the Clerk is directed to RE-NOTE plaintiff’s 22 motion for partial summary judgment, Dkt. 66, for April 28, 2017, the same day defendants’ 23 motion is noted. ORDER - 1 (2) 1 In accordance with the local rules, Plaintiff may file a reply brief in support of his 2 motion for partial summary judgment on or before the noting date, which is now April 28, 2017. 3 Thus, plaintiff’s motions for extension of time, Dkts. 71 & 72, are DENIED as moot. (3) 4 Plaintiff’s motion for an order directing the Clerk to photocopy exhibits in color, 5 Dkt. 69, is DENIED. Documents that are e-filed with the Court, including the exhibits 6 accompanying plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment, are scanned in their original 7 color. Accordingly, plaintiff does not need to submit hard copies of the exhibits that are in color. (4) 8 9 10 74 & 75. Within seven days of the date of this order, defendants shall correct any filing error or provide a brief explanation to the Court as to why two motions were filed. (5) 11 12 13 It appears that defendants filed their summary judgment motion twice. See Dkts. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this order to the parties and to Judge Robart. Dated this 3rd day of April, 2017. A 14 JAMES P. DONOHUE Chief United States Magistrate Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?