Michael Kantor et al v. BigTip, Inc. et al
Filing
117
ORDER GRANTING Stipulated Dismissal of Defendant George Bremer From This Action With Prejudice by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (lp)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
MICHAEL KANTOR, et. al.,
Plaintiffs,
11
12
13
14
v.
BIG TIP, INC., et. al.,
CASE NO. 15-1871MJP
ORDER GRANTING THE
STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF
DEFENDANT GEORGE BREMER
FROM THE ACTION, WITH
PREJUDICE
Defendants.
15
16
Plaintiffs Michael Kantor, SLM Holdings Limited, LLC, 3 Wise Ventures, Inc., and
17
Cabbage Tree Investments, LLC, by their counsel Paul W. Chandler and Chandler Law Firm and
18
Andrew Escobar and Jeffrey B. DeGroot and DLA Piper LLP, and Defendants Big Tip, Inc., by
19
its counsel Andrew N. Sachs and Ogden Murphy Wallace PLLC; WhoToo, Inc., by its counsel
20
Andrew N. Sachs and Ogden Murphy Wallace PLLC and Anne Cohen and Thenell Law Group;
21
Demandbase, Inc., by its counsel Andrew N. Sachs and Ogden Murphy Wallace PLLC; George
22
Bremer, by his counsel, Patricia A. Eakes, Damon Clay Elder and Calfo Eakes & Ostrovsky,
23
PLLC and David J. Miclean and Carmen M. Aviles and Miclean Gleason LLP; and Matt
24
ORDER GRANTING THE STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT GEORGE BREMER FROM THE
ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE - 1
1
Rowlen, by his counsel Andrew N. Sachs and Ogden Murphy Wallace PLLC, and Anne Cohen
2
and Thenell Law Group, hereby stipulate per Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) to dismissal of Defendant
3
George Bremer from this action with prejudice. As between each other, Plaintiffs and George
4
Bremer are to bear their own fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated September 6, 2017.
7
A
8
Marsha J. Pechman
United States District Judge
6
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER GRANTING THE STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT GEORGE BREMER FROM THE
ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?