Michael Kantor et al v. BigTip, Inc. et al

Filing 117

ORDER GRANTING Stipulated Dismissal of Defendant George Bremer From This Action With Prejudice by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (lp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 MICHAEL KANTOR, et. al., Plaintiffs, 11 12 13 14 v. BIG TIP, INC., et. al., CASE NO. 15-1871MJP ORDER GRANTING THE STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT GEORGE BREMER FROM THE ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiffs Michael Kantor, SLM Holdings Limited, LLC, 3 Wise Ventures, Inc., and 17 Cabbage Tree Investments, LLC, by their counsel Paul W. Chandler and Chandler Law Firm and 18 Andrew Escobar and Jeffrey B. DeGroot and DLA Piper LLP, and Defendants Big Tip, Inc., by 19 its counsel Andrew N. Sachs and Ogden Murphy Wallace PLLC; WhoToo, Inc., by its counsel 20 Andrew N. Sachs and Ogden Murphy Wallace PLLC and Anne Cohen and Thenell Law Group; 21 Demandbase, Inc., by its counsel Andrew N. Sachs and Ogden Murphy Wallace PLLC; George 22 Bremer, by his counsel, Patricia A. Eakes, Damon Clay Elder and Calfo Eakes & Ostrovsky, 23 PLLC and David J. Miclean and Carmen M. Aviles and Miclean Gleason LLP; and Matt 24 ORDER GRANTING THE STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT GEORGE BREMER FROM THE ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE - 1 1 Rowlen, by his counsel Andrew N. Sachs and Ogden Murphy Wallace PLLC, and Anne Cohen 2 and Thenell Law Group, hereby stipulate per Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) to dismissal of Defendant 3 George Bremer from this action with prejudice. As between each other, Plaintiffs and George 4 Bremer are to bear their own fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated September 6, 2017. 7 A 8 Marsha J. Pechman United States District Judge 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER GRANTING THE STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT GEORGE BREMER FROM THE ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?