Michael Kantor et al v. BigTip, Inc. et al
Filing
126
ORDER granting 124 Stipulated Motion to Substitute Attorney for Defendant Demandbase,Inc., signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (SWT) (Added attorney Benjamin I VandenBerghe, Nathaniel Hedberg Somers for Demandbase, Inc.)
HONORABLE MARSHA J. PECHMAN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF
WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
11
12
MICHAEL KANTOR, an individual; SLM
HOLDINGS LIMITED, LLC, a Nevada
limited
liability
company;
3WISE
VENTURES,
INC.,
a
Delaware
corporation; and CABBAGE TREE
INVESTMENTS, LLC, a Washington
limited liability company,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
NO. 2:15-cv-01871-MJP
STIPULATED MOTION FOR ORDER
GRANTING LEAVE FOR
WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION
OF COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT
DEMANDBASE, INC.
NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR:
v.
NOVEMBER 3, 2017
BIG TIP, INC., a Washington corporation;
WHOTOO,
INC.,
a
Washington
corporation; DEMANDBASE, INC., a
California
corporation;
GEORGE
BREMER,
an
individual;
MATT
ROWLEN, an individual; and DOES 1 to
20,
Defendants.
I. STIPULATION
21
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Andrew Sachs of Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC,
22
hereby withdraws as counsel for defendant Demandbase, Inc., and that Benjamin
23
I. VandenBerghe and Nathaniel H. Somers of Montgomery Purdue Blankinship &
24
Austin PLLC hereby substitute and appear as the attorney of record for Demandbase,
25
Inc., a defendant in the above-captioned case, effective as of the date ordered by this
26
STIPULATED MOTION FOR ORDER
GRANTING LEAVE FOR WITHDRAWAL AND
SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR DEF.
DEMANDBASE, INC.
(2:15-cv-01871-RAJ) - 1
1
Court. All further pleadings, except original service of process, should be served on
2
substituting counsel in accordance with the Court’s rules for electronic filing and
3
service.
4
5
6
This stipulated motion and proposed order has been served on the client and
all counsel pursuant to LCR 83.2(b)(1).
STIPULATED AND AGREED TO this 18th day of October, 2017.
7
Substituting Counsel:
Withdrawing Counsel:
MONTGOMERY PURDUE BLANKINSHIP
& AUSTIN PLLC
OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE,
PLLC
/s/ Benjamin I. VandenBerghe
Benjamin I. VandenBerghe, WSBA #35477
Nathaniel H. Somers, WSBA #46554
701 Fifth Ave., Suite 5500
Seattle, WA 98104
Phone: 206-682-7090
Fax: 206-625-9534
Email: biv@mpba.com
Email: nsomer@mpba.com
Substituting Attorneys for Defendant
Demandbase, Inc.
/s/ Andrew Sachs
Andrew Sachs, WSBA #38454
901 5th Ave., Suite 3500
Seattle, WA 98164
Phone: 206-447-7000
Fax: 206-447-0215
Email: asachs@omwlaw.com
Withdrawing Attorney for Defendant
Demandbase, Inc.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
STIPULATED MOTION FOR ORDER
GRANTING LEAVE FOR WITHDRAWAL AND
SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR DEF.
DEMANDBASE, INC.
(2:15-cv-01871-RAJ) - 2
II. ORDER
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated this 20th day of October, 2017.
4
5
A
6
7
Marsha J. Pechman
United States District Judge
8
9
10
Presented by:
MONTGOMERY PURDUE BLANKINSHIP
& AUSTIN PLLC
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
By: /s/ Benjamin I. VandenBerghe
Benjamin I. VandenBerghe, WSBA #35477
Nathaniel H. Somers, WSBA #46554
701 Fifth Ave., Suite 5500
Seattle, WA 98104
Phone: 206-682-7090
Fax: 206-625-9534
Email: biv@mpba.com
Email: nsomers@mpba.com
Substituting Attorneys for Defendant Demandbase, Inc.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
STIPULATED MOTION FOR ORDER
GRANTING LEAVE FOR WITHDRAWAL AND
SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR DEF.
DEMANDBASE, INC.
(2:15-cv-01871-RAJ) - 3
1
2
3
4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on the 18th day of October, 2017, I filed the foregoing with
the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such
filing to all counsel of record.
5
6
DATED this 18th day of October, 2017, at Seattle, Washington.
7
8
s/ Nathaniel H. Somers
Nathaniel H. Somers, WSBA No. 46554
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
STIPULATED MOTION FOR ORDER
GRANTING LEAVE FOR WITHDRAWAL AND
SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR DEF.
DEMANDBASE, INC.
(2:15-cv-01871-RAJ) - 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?