Michael Kantor et al v. BigTip, Inc. et al

Filing 126

ORDER granting 124 Stipulated Motion to Substitute Attorney for Defendant Demandbase,Inc., signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (SWT) (Added attorney Benjamin I VandenBerghe, Nathaniel Hedberg Somers for Demandbase, Inc.)

Download PDF
HONORABLE MARSHA J. PECHMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 11 12 MICHAEL KANTOR, an individual; SLM HOLDINGS LIMITED, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; 3WISE VENTURES, INC., a Delaware corporation; and CABBAGE TREE INVESTMENTS, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 NO. 2:15-cv-01871-MJP STIPULATED MOTION FOR ORDER GRANTING LEAVE FOR WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT DEMANDBASE, INC. NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: v. NOVEMBER 3, 2017 BIG TIP, INC., a Washington corporation; WHOTOO, INC., a Washington corporation; DEMANDBASE, INC., a California corporation; GEORGE BREMER, an individual; MATT ROWLEN, an individual; and DOES 1 to 20, Defendants. I. STIPULATION 21 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Andrew Sachs of Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLC, 22 hereby withdraws as counsel for defendant Demandbase, Inc., and that Benjamin 23 I. VandenBerghe and Nathaniel H. Somers of Montgomery Purdue Blankinship & 24 Austin PLLC hereby substitute and appear as the attorney of record for Demandbase, 25 Inc., a defendant in the above-captioned case, effective as of the date ordered by this 26 STIPULATED MOTION FOR ORDER GRANTING LEAVE FOR WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR DEF. DEMANDBASE, INC. (2:15-cv-01871-RAJ) - 1 1 Court. All further pleadings, except original service of process, should be served on 2 substituting counsel in accordance with the Court’s rules for electronic filing and 3 service. 4 5 6 This stipulated motion and proposed order has been served on the client and all counsel pursuant to LCR 83.2(b)(1). STIPULATED AND AGREED TO this 18th day of October, 2017. 7 Substituting Counsel: Withdrawing Counsel: MONTGOMERY PURDUE BLANKINSHIP & AUSTIN PLLC OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE, PLLC /s/ Benjamin I. VandenBerghe Benjamin I. VandenBerghe, WSBA #35477 Nathaniel H. Somers, WSBA #46554 701 Fifth Ave., Suite 5500 Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: 206-682-7090 Fax: 206-625-9534 Email: biv@mpba.com Email: nsomer@mpba.com Substituting Attorneys for Defendant Demandbase, Inc. /s/ Andrew Sachs Andrew Sachs, WSBA #38454 901 5th Ave., Suite 3500 Seattle, WA 98164 Phone: 206-447-7000 Fax: 206-447-0215 Email: asachs@omwlaw.com Withdrawing Attorney for Defendant Demandbase, Inc. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATED MOTION FOR ORDER GRANTING LEAVE FOR WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR DEF. DEMANDBASE, INC. (2:15-cv-01871-RAJ) - 2 II. ORDER 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 Dated this 20th day of October, 2017. 4 5 A 6 7 Marsha J. Pechman United States District Judge 8 9 10 Presented by: MONTGOMERY PURDUE BLANKINSHIP & AUSTIN PLLC 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 By: /s/ Benjamin I. VandenBerghe Benjamin I. VandenBerghe, WSBA #35477 Nathaniel H. Somers, WSBA #46554 701 Fifth Ave., Suite 5500 Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: 206-682-7090 Fax: 206-625-9534 Email: biv@mpba.com Email: nsomers@mpba.com Substituting Attorneys for Defendant Demandbase, Inc. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATED MOTION FOR ORDER GRANTING LEAVE FOR WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR DEF. DEMANDBASE, INC. (2:15-cv-01871-RAJ) - 3 1 2 3 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the 18th day of October, 2017, I filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all counsel of record. 5 6 DATED this 18th day of October, 2017, at Seattle, Washington. 7 8 s/ Nathaniel H. Somers Nathaniel H. Somers, WSBA No. 46554 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATED MOTION FOR ORDER GRANTING LEAVE FOR WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR DEF. DEMANDBASE, INC. (2:15-cv-01871-RAJ) - 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?