Michael Kantor et al v. BigTip, Inc. et al
Filing
163
MINUTE ORDER granting in part Plaintiffs' 157 Motion to Amend the Case Schedule. The deadline for Plaintiffs' responses to Defendants' dispositive motions will be extended to January 24, 2018. Plaintiffs' reply briefing will be due on January 29, 2018. Defendants' dispositive motions 139 144 146 and 150 are re-noted for 1/29/2018. Authorized by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
MICHAEL KANTOR, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
11
12
13
14
v.
CASE NO. C15-1871 MJP
MINUTE ORDER RE:
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO
AMEND THE CASE SCHEDULE
BIGTIP, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable Marsha
J. Pechman, United States District Judge:
The Court has received and reviewed Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend the Case Schedule
19
(Dkt. No. 157), Defendants’ Response (Dkt. No. 159), Plaintiffs’ Reply (Dkt. No. 160), and all
20
attached exhibits and declarations. The Court rules as follows:
21
The motion IS PARTIALLY GRANTED. The deadline for Plaintiffs’ responses to
22
Defendants’ dispositive motions will be extended to January 24, 2018. Plaintiffs’ reply briefing
23
will be due on January 29, 2018 (which will also be the date to which the motions are re-noted).
24
MINUTE ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO AMEND THE CASE SCHEDULE - 1
1
Any further extensions of the dispositive motions briefing schedule would represent an
2
unacceptable infringement on the Court’s time to read and rule on those motions and will not be
3
entertained.
4
5
The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel.
6
Filed: January 5, 2018.
7
8
9
William M. McCool
Clerk of Court
s/Paula McNabb
Deputy Clerk
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
MINUTE ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO AMEND THE CASE SCHEDULE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?