Seattle Times Company v. LeatherCare, Inc.

Filing 345

ORDER granting LeatherCare, Inc.'s 339 Unopposed Motion to Stay of Execution of Judgment. LeatherCare, Inc. shall post bond within 21 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)

Download PDF
The Honorable Thomas S. Zilly 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 5 6 SEATTLE TIMES COMPANY, Plaintiff, 7 v. 8 9 Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. 11 13 ORDER LEATHERCARE, INC.; STEVEN RITT, an individual; and the marital community composed of STEVEN RITT and LAURIE ROSEN-RITT, 10 12 NO. 2:15-cv-01901-TSZ TOUCHSTONE SLU LLC, a Washington limited liability company; and TB TS/RELP LLC, a Washington limited liability company, Third-Party Defendants. 14 LeatherCare, Inc.’s unopposed Motion for Stay of Execution of Judgment Pursuant to 15 16 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(b), docket no. 339, is GRANTED. Execution on the portion of the August 15, 2018, Judgment (docket no. 271) owed by LeatherCare, Inc. to the Seattle 17 Times Company in the amount of $1,854,755.39 is hereby STAYED. 18 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that LeatherCare, Inc. shall post a bond in the amount of 19 $1,945,267.00, which shall not expire sooner than 24 months from the date of its issuance. Said 20 bond shall be posted within 21 days of the date of this Order. DATED this 24th day of May, 2019. 21 A 22 23 ORDER - 1 1919801.01 Thomas S. Zilly United States District Judge 1 Presented by: 2 RYAN, SWANSON & CLEVELAND, PLLC 3 By s/ Jo M. Flannery Jo M. Flannery, WSBA #26086 4 Kristin Nealey Meier, WSBA #33562 Attorneys for Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs RYAN, SWANSON & CLEVELAND, PLLC 5 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3400 Seattle, Washington 98101-3034 6 Telephone: (206) 464-4224 Facsimile: (206) 583-0359 7 flannery@ryanlaw.com kmeier@ryanlaw.com 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER - 2 1919801.01

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?