Seattle Times Company v. LeatherCare, Inc.
Filing
345
ORDER granting LeatherCare, Inc.'s 339 Unopposed Motion to Stay of Execution of Judgment. LeatherCare, Inc. shall post bond within 21 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
The Honorable Thomas S. Zilly
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
5
6
SEATTLE TIMES COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
7
v.
8
9
Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs,
v.
11
13
ORDER
LEATHERCARE, INC.; STEVEN RITT, an
individual; and the marital community composed
of STEVEN RITT and LAURIE ROSEN-RITT,
10
12
NO. 2:15-cv-01901-TSZ
TOUCHSTONE SLU LLC, a Washington limited
liability company; and TB TS/RELP LLC, a
Washington limited liability company,
Third-Party Defendants.
14
LeatherCare, Inc.’s unopposed Motion for Stay of Execution of Judgment Pursuant to
15
16
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(b), docket no. 339, is GRANTED. Execution on the portion
of the August 15, 2018, Judgment (docket no. 271) owed by LeatherCare, Inc. to the Seattle
17
Times Company in the amount of $1,854,755.39 is hereby STAYED.
18
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that LeatherCare, Inc. shall post a bond in the amount of
19 $1,945,267.00, which shall not expire sooner than 24 months from the date of its issuance. Said
20 bond shall be posted within 21 days of the date of this Order.
DATED this 24th day of May, 2019.
21
A
22
23
ORDER - 1
1919801.01
Thomas S. Zilly
United States District Judge
1 Presented by:
2 RYAN, SWANSON & CLEVELAND, PLLC
3 By s/ Jo M. Flannery
Jo M. Flannery, WSBA #26086
4
Kristin Nealey Meier, WSBA #33562
Attorneys for Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs
RYAN, SWANSON & CLEVELAND, PLLC
5
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3400
Seattle, Washington 98101-3034
6
Telephone: (206) 464-4224
Facsimile: (206) 583-0359
7
flannery@ryanlaw.com
kmeier@ryanlaw.com
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER - 2
1919801.01
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?