Seattle Times Company v. LeatherCare, Inc.

Filing 72

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice parties' 69 Stipulated Motion to Amend the Case Schedule ; A telephonic scheduling conference is SET for Thursday, August 24, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. Counsel shall arrange a conference call among themselves and then contact the Court at (206) 370-8830. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(SWT)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 5 6 7 SEATTLE TIMES COMPANY, Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 11 LEATHERCARE, INC.; STEVEN RITT; and the marital community composed of STEVEN RITT and LAURIE ROSENRITT, Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs, 12 C15-1901 TSZ MINUTE ORDER v. 13 14 TOUCHSTONE SLU LLC; TB TS/RELP LLC; AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO.; and DOES 1-20, Third-Party Defendants. 15 16 17 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: (1) The Court DENIES without prejudice the parties’ stipulated motion to 18 amend the case schedule, docket no. 69. The parties propose to extend the dispositivemotions filing deadline for three weeks without any adjustment to the trial date. Such 19 extension would result in dispositive motions being noted less than one week before motions in limine are due and less than one month before the Pretrial Conference, which 20 is from the Court’s perspective unworkable. (2) A telephonic scheduling conference is SET for Thursday, August 24, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. Counsel shall arrange a conference call among themselves and then contact 22 the Court at (206) 370-8830. 21 23 MINUTE ORDER - 1 1 (3) record. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of 2 Dated this 17th day of August, 2017. 3 William M. McCool Clerk 4 s/Karen Dews Deputy Clerk 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 MINUTE ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?