Ride the Ducks International, LLC v. T.H.E. Insurance Company
Filing
68
MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 67 Stipulated Motion; RENOTING Defendant T.H.E. Insurance Companys 62 MOTION for Summary Judgment, Defendant T.H.E. Insurance Company's 44 MOTION for Joinder of Additional Parties, Plaintiff Ride the Ducks International's 55 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment : Noting Date 5/19/2017. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(SWT)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
RIDE THE DUCKS INTERNATIONAL,
LLC,
Plaintiff,
9
10
and
RIDE THE DUCKS SEATTLE, LLC,
Intervenor,
11
12
15
16
17
T.H.E. INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant.
T.H.E. INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v.
RIDE THE DUCKS INTERNATIONAL,
LLC; NA RA YOON; PHUONG DINH;
ESTATE OF KIM HA RAM; KIM
SOON WAN; and JEONG JU HEE,
Defendants.
18
19
20
MINUTE ORDER
v.
13
14
C15-1982 TSZ
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable
Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge:
(1)
The parties’ stipulated motion, docket no. 67, to continue the cross-motions
21 for summary judgment is GRANTED. The cross-motions for summary judgment on the
duty to defend, docket nos. 55 and 62, are RENOTED to May 19, 2017. The deadline for
22 Ride the Ducks International to file its consolidated response to cross-motion and reply in
23
MINUTE ORDER - 1
1 support of its motion is EXTENDED to May 12, 2017. T.H.E. Insurance Company’s
reply in support of its cross-motion shall be filed by the new noting date. The deferred
2 portion of T.H.E. Insurance Company’s motion to join additional parties, docket no. 44,
is also RENOTED to May 19, 2017.
3
(2)
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of
4 record.
5
Dated this 3rd day of May, 2017.
6
William M. McCool
Clerk
7
s/Karen Dews
Deputy Clerk
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
MINUTE ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?