Pickering et al v. Bank of America Home Loans et al

Filing 79

ORDER granting Defendant Bank of America's 75 Motion to Extend Trial Date and Trial Order Deadlines, signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiffs via USPS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 10 STEPHANIE PICKERING and TERRY A. O’KEEFE, Plaintiffs, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 v. Case No. 2:15-cv-01983-RSM ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA’S MOTION TO EXTEND TRIAL DATE AND TRIAL ORDER DEADLINES BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; QUALITY LOAN SERVICING CORP. WASHINGTON; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM (“MERS”); and DOES 1-10, Inclusively, Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon the filing of Defendant Bank of America’s Motion to Extend Trial Date and Trial Order Deadlines (the “Motion”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b); all parties having been given notice and an opportunity to 24 respond; the Court having reviewed all pleadings filed by all parties relating to the Motion; and 25 the Court having reviewed the records and files herein, it is hereby: 26 27 ORDERED that Defendant Bank of America’s Motion is GRANTED; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the dates set forth in the Trial Order are extended for a period 28 of ninety days from the date of this Order. A revised scheduling order will follow. ORDER GRANTING BANK OF AMERICA’S MOTION TO EXTEND TRIAL DATE AND DEADLINES OF TRIAL ORDER - 1 1 Dated this 8 day of August 2018. 2 A 3 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4 5 6 7 Presented by: WITHERSPOON • KELLEY 8 9 10 11 s/ Michael J. Kapaun Michael J. Kapaun, WSBA No. 36864 Attorneys for Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (also erroneously sued as “Bank of America Home Loans”) 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING BANK OF AMERICA’S MOTION TO EXTEND TRIAL DATE AND DEADLINES OF TRIAL ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?