Black v. Pride Mobility Products Corporation

Filing 218

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 216 Motion for Leave to File Over-length Motion, signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)

Download PDF
HONORABLE THOMAS S. ZILLY 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 LEA BLACK, 10 11 12 13 No. 2:15−cv−02008−TSZ Plaintiff, v. PRIDE MOBILITY PRODUCTS CORPORATION, et al., ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO FILE OVER-LENGTH MOTION Defendants. 14 15 16 THIS MATTER having come on regularly before this Court for hearing upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Over-length Motion, docket no. 216, and the Court 17 having heard the argument of counsel, reviewed the motion and the records and files herein, 18 19 20 21 22 now, therefore, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff’s Motion to File Over-Length Motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiff may file her motion of 24 pages. DATED this 6th day of August, 2018. A 23 24 Thomas S. Zilly United States District Judge 25 26 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE OVER-LENGTH MOTION - 1 No. 2:15−cv−02008−TSZ SCHROETER, GOLDMARK & BENDER 500 Central Building ● 810 Third Avenue ● Seattle, WA 98104 Phone (206) 622-8000 ● Fax (206) 682-2305 1 Presented by: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 SCHROETER, GOLDMARK & BENDER By: s/Peter O’Neil PETER O’NEIL, WSBA #28198 By: s/Sims Weymuller SIMS WEYMULLER, WSBA #33026 By: s/Lucas Garrett LUCAS GARRETT, WSBA #38452 Counsel for Plaintiff SCHROETER, GOLDMARK & BENDER 810 Third Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: (206) 622-8000 Fax: (206) 682-2305 E-mail: peter@peteroneil.org sims@sgb-law.com garrett@sgb-law.com 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE OVER-LENGTH MOTION - 2 No. 2:15−cv−02008−TSZ SCHROETER, GOLDMARK & BENDER 500 Central Building ● 810 Third Avenue ● Seattle, WA 98104 Phone (206) 622-8000 ● Fax (206) 682-2305

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?