Black v. Pride Mobility Products Corporation
Filing
218
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 216 Motion for Leave to File Over-length Motion, signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
HONORABLE THOMAS S. ZILLY
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
LEA BLACK,
10
11
12
13
No. 2:15−cv−02008−TSZ
Plaintiff,
v.
PRIDE MOBILITY PRODUCTS
CORPORATION, et al.,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO FILE OVER-LENGTH
MOTION
Defendants.
14
15
16
THIS MATTER having come on regularly before this Court for hearing upon
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Over-length Motion, docket no. 216, and the Court
17
having heard the argument of counsel, reviewed the motion and the records and files herein,
18
19
20
21
22
now, therefore,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff’s Motion to File
Over-Length Motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiff may file her motion of 24 pages.
DATED this 6th day of August, 2018.
A
23
24
Thomas S. Zilly
United States District Judge
25
26
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE
TO FILE OVER-LENGTH MOTION - 1
No. 2:15−cv−02008−TSZ
SCHROETER, GOLDMARK & BENDER
500 Central Building ● 810 Third Avenue ● Seattle, WA 98104
Phone (206) 622-8000 ● Fax (206) 682-2305
1
Presented by:
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
SCHROETER, GOLDMARK & BENDER
By: s/Peter O’Neil
PETER O’NEIL, WSBA #28198
By: s/Sims Weymuller
SIMS WEYMULLER, WSBA #33026
By: s/Lucas Garrett
LUCAS GARRETT, WSBA #38452
Counsel for Plaintiff
SCHROETER, GOLDMARK & BENDER
810 Third Avenue, Suite 500
Seattle, WA 98104
Phone: (206) 622-8000
Fax: (206) 682-2305
E-mail:
peter@peteroneil.org
sims@sgb-law.com
garrett@sgb-law.com
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE
TO FILE OVER-LENGTH MOTION - 2
No. 2:15−cv−02008−TSZ
SCHROETER, GOLDMARK & BENDER
500 Central Building ● 810 Third Avenue ● Seattle, WA 98104
Phone (206) 622-8000 ● Fax (206) 682-2305
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?