Black v. Pride Mobility Products Corporation
Filing
240
ORDER RE HEARING ON MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR ALLEGED DISCOVERY VIOLATIONS by Hon. James P. Donohue. (TF)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
13
v.
PRIDE MOBILITY PRODUCTS
CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, et
al.,
14
17
18
19
20
ORDER RE HEARING ON MOTION
FOR SANCTIONS FOR ALLEGED
DISCOVERY VIOLATIONS
Defendants.
15
16
NO. C15-2008-TSZ
LEA BLACK,
This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. During the hearing on plaintiff’s
Motion for Sanctions, Dkt. 219, set for Wednesday, September 19, 2018 at 9 a.m., the parties
should be prepared to present argument related to the alleged discovery violations in this case,
including defendants’ failure to timely disclose the Pamela Smith claim, information provided
21
in responses to discovery requests in cases against Pride that involved braking defects,
22
freewheeling complaints, and information on recall orders. With respect to Mr. Zablocky, Mr.
23
Burns, and Mr. Hoyes, defendants shall initially have an opportunity to present testimony
24
regarding the witnesses’ attempts to comply with plaintiffs’ discovery requests, plaintiffs shall
25
26
ORDER - 1
1
have an opportunity to cross-examine each witness, and then defendants may briefly provide
2
rebuttal testimony. Finally, the Court may also ask questions of each witness.
3
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to all counsel of record, and to
4
5
6
Judge Zilly.
DATED this 17th day of September, 2018.
A
7
JAMES P. DONOHUE
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?